MSDN vs. Windows Dev Center
Does anybody know the logic behind (a.) Microsoft maintaining a clumsy duplicate of the MSDN Library by the name "Windows Dev Center" and (b.) why Google turns up these awful results links now?
The traditional MSDN pages have their disadvantages, but at least the navigation tree at the left is useful compared to the flat "list of peers" that replaces the tree in "Dev Center."
The traditional pages are also readable instead of having that Windows 7 washed out colors theme used by the Dev Center.
Compare and contrast with this example.
MSDN Library: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/libr...90(VS.85).aspx
Dev Center: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/libr...(v=vs.85).aspx
I hope you have your strongest reading glasses on.
This travesty seemed to rear its head first about the time Microsoft began preparing for the Win8-centric BUILD conference. To me it seems like another example of the Windows Entropy we're seeing with Phone 7 and Windows 8.
Not only are the traditional pages easier to read (can you say contrast?), but the treeview at the left makes it a whole lot easier to start by reading about a Property, then go find a Method you need to review, etc. etc. etc.
Why has the company so forsaken the notion of "user experience" in favor of fad and fashion? And has anybody found a trick that makes Google (or Bing, or...) return the good pages?
Re: MSDN vs. Windows Dev Center
Maybe it's for people who are unable to access the MSDN Library for what reason.
Re: MSDN vs. Windows Dev Center
The MSDN Library was once a subscription-only CD service. MSDN Library Online was a later paid-only service, requiring an MSDN subscription, that parallelled the CD-based period. Some programming tools began to come with a "snaopshot" release of the MSDN Library on CDs, and one year of updates. This became the online Help in VB6.
Later the MSDN Library Online became a free service. Much of the software and tools that are part of an MSDN subscription now are ISO downloads instead of shipped CDs, but they were never free.
So that's the MSDN Library. Are you suggesting that these Win Dev Center pages are a mirror site or something? Even if so, why the poor navigation system and washed-out color scheme?
Re: MSDN vs. Windows Dev Center
My guess is that the pages / sites are done by different groups within Microsoft. Alternatively (or additionally), the Win Dev Center is more focused and another presentation that might get people who are more interested specifically in Windows topics, versus the broader "MSDN" topics.
I'm just speculating though. If you really want to know, we could ask Microsoft....
Brad!
Re: MSDN vs. Windows Dev Center
Well I've tried asking, assuming it was an error when I first noticed it. Never got a reply but perhaps I never asked via the right "door."
The new layout is more "spacious" (lots of white space) but the main font's color results in low contrast = lower readability, and using the breadcrumbs at the top of tha page instead of a tree make "browsing" for the next topic you need to see pretty clumsy.
I don't mind change, and we've grown to expect it. But the new presentation (of the same info) changed in some ways that aren't very helpful. I'd be glad to ignore the Dev Center entirely if Google and Bing searches didn't keep sending me there.
Re: MSDN vs. Windows Dev Center
I see what the problem is here: I don't suppose you are looking for a flashy site, only info.
Either way you're getting what you want - it just looks a bit different, so what? You may navigate mto MSDN and search it directly.
Re: MSDN vs. Windows Dev Center
My point was I'd be glad to ignore the Dev Center entirely if Google and Bing searches didn't keep sending me there.
"Behind the music" I'm worried they plan to phase out the legible and navigable pages in favor of the new "artsy scheme" pages.
Re: MSDN vs. Windows Dev Center
That's my point as well: you're getting twice as many results from search so what are you complaining about? :confused: The look? Who cares as long as you getting you questions answered.
Re: MSDN vs. Windows Dev Center
No, my concern isn't with twice the results, but that I get ONLY the "washed out colors, non-navigable" results in most cases. Quite often you can only get to the legible and navigable pages by manually going to the MSDN Library and manually drilling down.
Even the search there turns up the "Win7-ish graylady" pages.
Re: MSDN vs. Windows Dev Center
I'm must be missing something because link you provided is fully navigable and the "graylady" style isn't really that gray.
Re: MSDN vs. Windows Dev Center
For my part, I do see what you mean, but I have never seen the dev center come up as a result for any search. I agree with your criticisms of the look, as it is clearly low-contrast and less readable, I just didn't even know that dev center existed before that thread. And there ends any serious comment I have on the subject. On to my conclusion: Both Bing and Google do a certain amount of tailoring of their results to the searcher. In your case, they have noted your preferences, and are serving you dev center pages. You have angered the gods and are being punished accordingly.
Re: MSDN vs. Windows Dev Center
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Shaggy Hiker
You have angered the gods and are being punished accordingly.
Yes indeed. I seem to be quite good at that. :p
Well no more looking at Metro stuff for me then, maybe with time that search engine curse will wear off.
Re: MSDN vs. Windows Dev Center
How about posting a search term that is giving you that dev center. I really haven't ever seen it, and would like to do the same search to see what I get.
Re: MSDN vs. Windows Dev Center
The Dev center is definately less readable and doesnt contain a full navition tree. Sure it lists some items on the left but you cant tree up or drill down.
I hope they dont phase out MSDN
Re: MSDN vs. Windows Dev Center
Looks like it's a work in progress... if you start from the main "traditional" MSDN page... click on the "Windows" block... it takes you to the new dev center. So it seems to me that it's a work in progress roll out... not too keen on it myself. It's very hard on my eyes, the white is too white & too much of it.
-tg
Re: MSDN vs. Windows Dev Center
Many searches return these hits. Here is a Google search:
field object site:msdn.microsoft.com
The site modifier is used to help exclude some junky returns like those from w3schools.
First hit: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/libr...(v=vs.85).aspx
Second and third are Office and CDO hits I didnt want.
ado field object returns poor results with or without the site modifier.
Re: MSDN vs. Windows Dev Center
The Dev Center style with the flat navigation and left, breadcrumbs at the top, and low-contrast high whitespace theme overall reminds me of what some people think of as "classy" in a blog skin.
But thats another pet peeve: Hard to read blog skinning plus the general lack of prominent posting dates adjacent to blog post titles. Un-dated material can be quite frustrating when looking for something authoritative and relevant and having to comb blogs to get it. Why such datestamping isn't universal has always escaped me.
Re: MSDN vs. Windows Dev Center
Re: MSDN vs. Windows Dev Center
Ok, I'm beginning to see what you mean. They all say msdn, but the links are all to dev center, and I totally agree that it is an ugly, hard to read, washed out, poorly designed, mess of a page.
Re: MSDN vs. Windows Dev Center
Thanks. Then perhaps I'm not quite as insane as I thought. :eek2:
Re: MSDN vs. Windows Dev Center
Ive been getting that Dev center thing alot lately when looking up APIs and I agree with the OP...It is annoying but not because the page is ugly or anything but just because I've grown accustomed to the MSDN template. I cant exactly describe it but the Dev center just feels uncomfortable.
Re: MSDN vs. Windows Dev Center
I can live with the washed out colors. I don't approve of that, but I can live with it. The navigation appears to be considerably less efficient than the older style. That's not really a surprise, though. .NET had an awesome help right up through 2008, but when 2010 came out, the help that was included was horrid. Eventually, there were sufficient complaints, including complaints by several members of this site, that they came out with the new help tool that is currently in 2010. It's better, though not integrated as tightly as it was in 2008 (which is both good and bad, to be fair).
The point being: MS is willing to try different approaches to providing documentation, including bad ones.
Re: MSDN vs. Windows Dev Center
Notwithstanding the pale washout in dev centre the thing I miss is the tree on the left which tells you a lot about how deep you have navigated and related stuff at the same level as the document being viewed. The 'across the top menu' does not provide a quick check for the context for the document being viewed amoung its peers.