Results 1 to 23 of 23

Thread: AMD vs Intel

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Thread Starter
    Fanatic Member duc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    STEAM
    Posts
    702

    AMD vs Intel

    Is there really a better? Truthfully I think Intel last longer, but AMD seems to work better. I watched this one video from tomshardware.com where they showed what happens when you take the cooler/fan (something) off the chip, and on the intel's it just froze the game they were playing. Once they put it back on it worked fine. When they took it off the AMD's it actually started smoking and destroyed itself. I already have an AMD so I'm looking for advice on my next buy.

    -duc

  2. #2
    Addicted Member ajames's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Wales, UK
    Posts
    178

    Re: AMD vs Intel

    well, i'd say that AMD is better for games, and Intel is better for video editing.

  3. #3
    I'm about to be a PowerPoster!
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Everywhere
    Posts
    13,647

    Re: AMD vs Intel

    Well usually you don't take the cooler off your CPU...

    I'd say AMD offer the same speed for about half to two-thirds the price of the equivalent Intel processors.

    Yeah, more break, but that's usually because people stuff them by installing the coolers wrongly (like putting them on sideways). They are more fragile than Intel's, but that's not really a factor once the CPU is installed and running.

    Plus, AMD have created the new consumer 64-bit standard AMD64 ... the spec that Microsoft are using to make Windows... so Intel have to make their 64-bit processors AMD-compatible

  4. #4
    Addicted Member ajames's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Wales, UK
    Posts
    178

    Re: AMD vs Intel

    at the moment 64-bit processors dont do anything extra.

  5. #5
    KING BODWAD XXI BodwadUK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    2,176

    Re: AMD vs Intel

    I prefer AMD as they are cheaper and they run cooler (Or at least they used to).

    Pentiums are still good though as long as you avoid the Celerons
    If you dribble then you are as mad as me

    Lost World Creations Website (XBOX Indie games)
    Lene Marlin

  6. #6
    Banished Cander's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Why do you care?
    Posts
    6,913

    Re: AMD vs Intel

    For servers I would personally think Intel might be better with HT and all that, but on desktops, you cant beat the value of AMD chips and can get away with using cheap cooling (stock fans usually work fine).
    Stack Overflow
    See the features of Visual Studio 2010 and C# 4.0: The 10-4 show on Channel9

  7. #7
    Supreme User Madboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    England
    Posts
    3,253

    Re: AMD vs Intel

    Quote Originally Posted by BodwadUK
    I prefer AMD as they are cheaper and they run cooler (Or at least they used to).

    Pentiums are still good though as long as you avoid the Celerons
    I used to have a Intel Celeron 512Mhz

  8. #8
    Hyperactive Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    WGTN, New Zealand
    Posts
    338

    Re: AMD vs Intel

    Quote Originally Posted by ajames
    at the moment 64-bit processors dont do anything extra.
    Of course they do. Conventional 32-bit processors had to split 64-bit integers over multiple registers and 64-bit operations were very slow and latent. With the release of good, solid 64-bit architecture, software developers will be able to work efficiently with numbers over 4.2 billion.

    Now that IPv6 is out and used widely, you cannot store a long version of an IP address in a single 32-bit integer. Solution? Pad it out and put it into a 64-bit one! Either that or go the char[6] way.

  9. #9
    KING BODWAD XXI BodwadUK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    2,176

    Re: AMD vs Intel

    But it has to simulate 32bit surely thus slowing down 32bit programs?
    If you dribble then you are as mad as me

    Lost World Creations Website (XBOX Indie games)
    Lene Marlin

  10. #10
    I'm about to be a PowerPoster! mendhak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Ulaan Baator GooGoo: Frog
    Posts
    38,170

    Re: AMD vs Intel

    Quote Originally Posted by duc
    Is there really a better? Truthfully I think Intel last longer, but AMD seems to work better. I watched this one video from tomshardware.com where they showed what happens when you take the cooler/fan (something) off the chip, and on the intel's it just froze the game they were playing. Once they put it back on it worked fine. When they took it off the AMD's it actually started smoking and destroyed itself. I already have an AMD so I'm looking for advice on my next buy.

    -duc

    That's definitely a factor to consider if you happen to be one of the millions of people out there who takes the fan off the processor while playing games.

  11. #11
    Dazed Member
    Join Date
    Oct 1999
    Location
    Ridgefield Park, NJ
    Posts
    3,418

    Re: AMD vs Intel

    Id like to get a new amd 64 but at this point i can't see any advantages. Perhaps when i get cash for my voodoo ill opt for twin amd cpu's. I have no complaints about my p4 though. Hl2 and doom3 run pretty good.

  12. #12
    KING BODWAD XXI BodwadUK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    2,176

    Re: AMD vs Intel

    Dilenger looking at your sig you know roman numerals for 4 is IV not IIII
    If you dribble then you are as mad as me

    Lost World Creations Website (XBOX Indie games)
    Lene Marlin

  13. #13
    KrisSiegel.com Kasracer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    USA, Maryland
    Posts
    4,985

    Re: AMD vs Intel

    Quote Originally Posted by Dilenger4
    Id like to get a new amd 64 but at this point i can't see any advantages. Perhaps when i get cash for my voodoo ill opt for twin amd cpu's. I have no complaints about my p4 though. Hl2 and doom3 run pretty good.
    64bit Windows and Linux. It's quite cool. Too bad I don't have one yet

  14. #14
    Dazed Member
    Join Date
    Oct 1999
    Location
    Ridgefield Park, NJ
    Posts
    3,418

    Re: AMD vs Intel

    Posted by BodwadUK

    Dilenger looking at your sig you know roman numerals for 4 is IV not IIII
    Yeah i knew that but i didn't think that pent 3's which were labled III were really roman numerals. Seems intel threw them in the trash with the p4. Too bad though because in 2042 i could have changed my cpu specs in my sig to Intel PXXVII 500Ghz.

  15. #15
    Hyperactive Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    WGTN, New Zealand
    Posts
    338

    Re: AMD vs Intel

    Quote Originally Posted by Dilenger4
    Yeah i knew that but i didn't think that pent 3's which were labled III were really roman numerals. Seems intel threw them in the trash with the p4. Too bad though because in 2042 i could have changed my cpu specs in my sig to Intel PXXVII 500Ghz.
    Either that, or your version of PIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 500 GHz

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  



Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width