|
-
Apr 16th, 2005, 09:49 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Fanatic Member
AMD vs Intel
Is there really a better? Truthfully I think Intel last longer, but AMD seems to work better. I watched this one video from tomshardware.com where they showed what happens when you take the cooler/fan (something) off the chip, and on the intel's it just froze the game they were playing. Once they put it back on it worked fine. When they took it off the AMD's it actually started smoking and destroyed itself. I already have an AMD so I'm looking for advice on my next buy.
-duc
-
Apr 16th, 2005, 10:31 AM
#2
Addicted Member
Re: AMD vs Intel
well, i'd say that AMD is better for games, and Intel is better for video editing.
-
Apr 16th, 2005, 11:03 AM
#3
-
Apr 16th, 2005, 12:45 PM
#4
Addicted Member
Re: AMD vs Intel
at the moment 64-bit processors dont do anything extra.
-
Apr 18th, 2005, 04:27 AM
#5
KING BODWAD XXI
Re: AMD vs Intel
I prefer AMD as they are cheaper and they run cooler (Or at least they used to).
Pentiums are still good though as long as you avoid the Celerons
-
Apr 18th, 2005, 09:14 AM
#6
Re: AMD vs Intel
For servers I would personally think Intel might be better with HT and all that, but on desktops, you cant beat the value of AMD chips and can get away with using cheap cooling (stock fans usually work fine).
-
May 6th, 2005, 05:13 AM
#7
Supreme User
Re: AMD vs Intel
 Originally Posted by BodwadUK
I prefer AMD as they are cheaper and they run cooler (Or at least they used to).
Pentiums are still good though as long as you avoid the Celerons 
I used to have a Intel Celeron 512Mhz
-
May 3rd, 2005, 11:49 PM
#8
Hyperactive Member
Re: AMD vs Intel
 Originally Posted by ajames
at the moment 64-bit processors dont do anything extra.
Of course they do. Conventional 32-bit processors had to split 64-bit integers over multiple registers and 64-bit operations were very slow and latent. With the release of good, solid 64-bit architecture, software developers will be able to work efficiently with numbers over 4.2 billion.
Now that IPv6 is out and used widely, you cannot store a long version of an IP address in a single 32-bit integer. Solution? Pad it out and put it into a 64-bit one! Either that or go the char[6] way.
-
May 4th, 2005, 02:33 AM
#9
KING BODWAD XXI
Re: AMD vs Intel
But it has to simulate 32bit surely thus slowing down 32bit programs?
-
Apr 16th, 2005, 11:03 AM
#10
Re: AMD vs Intel
 Originally Posted by duc
Is there really a better? Truthfully I think Intel last longer, but AMD seems to work better. I watched this one video from tomshardware.com where they showed what happens when you take the cooler/fan (something) off the chip, and on the intel's it just froze the game they were playing. Once they put it back on it worked fine. When they took it off the AMD's it actually started smoking and destroyed itself. I already have an AMD so I'm looking for advice on my next buy.
-duc
That's definitely a factor to consider if you happen to be one of the millions of people out there who takes the fan off the processor while playing games.
-
Apr 30th, 2005, 08:05 PM
#11
Dazed Member
Re: AMD vs Intel
Id like to get a new amd 64 but at this point i can't see any advantages. Perhaps when i get cash for my voodoo ill opt for twin amd cpu's. I have no complaints about my p4 though. Hl2 and doom3 run pretty good.
-
May 3rd, 2005, 02:22 AM
#12
KING BODWAD XXI
Re: AMD vs Intel
Dilenger looking at your sig you know roman numerals for 4 is IV not IIII
-
May 3rd, 2005, 10:38 PM
#13
Re: AMD vs Intel
 Originally Posted by Dilenger4
Id like to get a new amd 64 but at this point i can't see any advantages. Perhaps when i get cash for my voodoo ill opt for twin amd cpu's. I have no complaints about my p4 though. Hl2 and doom3 run pretty good.
64bit Windows and Linux. It's quite cool. Too bad I don't have one yet
-
May 3rd, 2005, 11:28 PM
#14
Dazed Member
Re: AMD vs Intel
Posted by BodwadUK
Dilenger looking at your sig you know roman numerals for 4 is IV not IIII
Yeah i knew that but i didn't think that pent 3's which were labled III were really roman numerals. Seems intel threw them in the trash with the p4. Too bad though because in 2042 i could have changed my cpu specs in my sig to Intel PXXVII 500Ghz.
-
May 3rd, 2005, 11:46 PM
#15
Hyperactive Member
Re: AMD vs Intel
 Originally Posted by Dilenger4
Yeah i knew that but i didn't think that pent 3's which were labled III were really roman numerals. Seems intel threw them in the trash with the p4. Too bad though because in 2042 i could have changed my cpu specs in my sig to Intel PXXVII 500Ghz. 
Either that, or your version of PIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 500 GHz
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|