Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 71

Thread: Bush's Immigration Policy

  1. #1

    Thread Starter
    Frenzied Member Shawn N's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    1,631

    Bush's Immigration Policy

    Normally, I'm pro-Bush. But this time, being from South Texas where I've already seen my fair share of illegal immigrants (they're Mexicans - we all know it) I just can't see how this would benefit the US as a whole. For those who aren't familiar, here's the major points of the deal, taken from CNN:

    • Workers in the United States illegally join a temporary labor program.
    • Those now-illegal immigrants then can apply for permanent residence but get no preferential consideration.
    • Employers hiring these workers must show they cannot find U.S. laborers to fill their jobs.
    • These undocumented workers get guaranteed wage and employment rights.
    • These workers receive a temporary three-year visa, renewable once. They are expected to return to their countries of birth once their visas expire.
    • Congress is urged to increase current annual limit of 140,000 "Green Cards.".
    • The Department of Homeland Security is to administer the program.


    Bush is catching heat from both the left & the right on this issue, but it's still expected to pass. How about this: protect the goddamn southern border like we're protecting our airports and then we wouldn't have this problem. Round up all the illegals working for hotels (maids), farms (pickers), and whatever Mom & Pop businesses the majority of illegals go into and get hired.

    If the employer can't get those positions filled, then it's obvious that no one wants to do the kind of sh*it-in-your-face work for $4 an hour when they can go to McDonald's and do the same, if not better work. RAISE THE GODDAMN PAY!

    Sorry Mr. Man if it cuts into your profit and you're not going to be running at a 40% net over gross revenue, but rules are rules, laws are laws, and countries have borders for a reason.
    Please rate my post.

  2. #2
    Frenzied Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Gammapolis
    Posts
    1,474

    Re: Bush's Immigration Policy

    Originally posted by Shawn N
    How about this: protect the goddamn southern border like we're protecting our airports and then we wouldn't have this problem.
    Seems you have no idea what a border is.
    'Heading for the automatic overload'
    Marillion, Brave, The Great Escape, 1994

    'How will WE stand the FIRE TOMORROW?'
    Eloy, Silent Cries and Mighty Echoes, The Vision - Burning, 1979

  3. #3

    Thread Starter
    Frenzied Member Shawn N's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    1,631
    Great comment! Now what're you talking about?
    Please rate my post.

  4. #4
    Frenzied Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Gammapolis
    Posts
    1,474
    How long is the border between US and Mexico? What is that consist of? Mountains, desert, jungle, rivers, what? How they are supposed to protect it??? In an airport all passengers pass through some controlled gates. How many gates can take control of the long border???
    Last edited by Lunatic3; Jan 7th, 2004 at 09:57 PM.
    'Heading for the automatic overload'
    Marillion, Brave, The Great Escape, 1994

    'How will WE stand the FIRE TOMORROW?'
    Eloy, Silent Cries and Mighty Echoes, The Vision - Burning, 1979

  5. #5

    Thread Starter
    Frenzied Member Shawn N's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    1,631
    You're taking my wording too literally. All I'm saying is put the same kind of effort into border security as there is being put into airport security.

    I'm not saying to put a string of soldiers holding hands along the border from California to Texas, but protect the damn thing. Just because the majority of the problem is in the lower 4 states doesn't mean that it's not effecting the rest of the country.
    Please rate my post.

  6. #6
    KrisSiegel.com Kasracer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    USA, Maryland
    Posts
    4,985
    Originally posted by Shawn N
    Great comment! Now what're you talking about?
    It's impossible to guard the entire thing.

    I could GUARENTEE you I could cross the boarder back and forth without being detected. There is just no way in hell they're going to cover that HUGE ass boarder.

    I don't like the fact that illegals are now allowed to work here, but if a legitament business cannot find ANYONE to work, letting an illegal take the job isn't a big deal. The problem is that it'll be abused to all hell and Americans will probably end up losing more jobs to outsiders. It's bad enough IT companies are outsourcing to India.

  7. #7
    KrisSiegel.com Kasracer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    USA, Maryland
    Posts
    4,985
    Originally posted by Shawn N
    You're taking my wording too literally. All I'm saying is put the same kind of effort into border security as there is being put into airport security.
    That would be stupid. People can get into an Airport and fly a 30ton (I don't know how much an Airplane weights, lets just say it's 30ton) loaded with fuel into ANYTHING or even blow one up. With the border, all they have access to is a fancy fence.

    Now would you rather protect 30tons of metal and fuel that can be flown at over 500MPh, or a fence and a few people coming in every so often?

    The answer is obvious.

    BTW, we need a forums for crap like this, I don't like getting into these arguements but I ALWAYS end up getting into them.

  8. #8

    Thread Starter
    Frenzied Member Shawn N's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    1,631
    I'm not arguing.

    Here's what I'd like see done by the federal government (not state government) to help guard the border: Put military watchposts on the border that have cities (population) within 30 miles of the border on either side. That's it.

    If there's a city within 30 miles of the border on the US side, put something there near the border. If there's a city within 30 miles of the border on the Mexican side, put something there near the border.

    It's not a perfect plan, but it gets the ball rolling.
    Please rate my post.

  9. #9
    KrisSiegel.com Kasracer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    USA, Maryland
    Posts
    4,985
    Screw that, I say we extend the fence to be 20 feet under ground and 10 more feet above ground, then electrify the fence with a FATAL dose of electricity

  10. #10

    Thread Starter
    Frenzied Member Shawn N's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    1,631
    I'd be all for fatal but killing animals would put PETA's panties in a wad.

    Anyways, I guess there's no differentiating opinions on the subject. Strange.
    Please rate my post.

  11. #11
    Hyperactive Member Juan Carlos Rey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Mendoza, Argentina
    Posts
    301
    Have you heard of NAFTA?
    Or it only works one-way?
    Combat poverty: kill a poor!!

  12. #12

    Thread Starter
    Frenzied Member Shawn N's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    1,631
    I fail to see the basis of your argument.

    You're talking about an agreement between 3 countries that lifted tariffs and duties yet managed to benefit both Canada and Mexico due to lower wages. The US is importing more, exporting less.

    What are you talking about?
    Please rate my post.

  13. #13
    KrisSiegel.com Kasracer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    USA, Maryland
    Posts
    4,985
    Originally posted by Juan Carlos Rey
    Have you heard of NAFTA?
    Or it only works one-way?
    Do you know what NAFTA is?

  14. #14
    Fanatic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Posts
    770
    The US is importing more, exporting less.
    Well that depends on what you are importing and exporting, US corporations do export alot of jobs for cheaper production in other countries and then re-import the goods.

  15. #15

    Thread Starter
    Frenzied Member Shawn N's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    1,631
    Originally posted by nkad
    Well that depends on what you are importing and exporting, US corporations do export alot of jobs for cheaper production in other countries and then re-import the goods.
    Funny - that's exactly how I see IT outsourcing.
    Please rate my post.

  16. #16
    Fanatic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Posts
    770
    Exactly! sucks.

  17. #17
    Frenzied Member DeadEyes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    1,196
    Well Shawn N you can always join ranch rescue, and let's face it the whole thing is just to try and get hispanic votes, like Bush said in the last election "I'm proud to have latin blood in my body" or something to that effect

  18. #18
    Banished Cander's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Why do you care?
    Posts
    6,913
    Originally posted by kasracer
    Do you know what NAFTA is?
    At least he didntsay NAMBLA
    Stack Overflow
    See the features of Visual Studio 2010 and C# 4.0: The 10-4 show on Channel9

  19. #19
    Super Moderator Shaggy Hiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    40,106
    Protecting that border would be far bigger than the airports. Putting up guard posts isn't even a partial solution. If you harden one part of the border, that just moves the migration to other parts, and the thing is too bloody long to harden all of it. Putting up a "fence", whether it be real, or a cordon of eyes, is economically impractical. I understand the desire, but the thing is too big. Even the Great Wall of China wouldn't actually work. Not only would you need the wall, but you'd need to patrol it regularly.

  20. #20
    Fanatic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Posts
    770
    How about an invisible, high amp, force field like the kind used in Star Trek. I’ll go build one, brb…

  21. #21
    KrisSiegel.com Kasracer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    USA, Maryland
    Posts
    4,985
    Originally posted by nkad
    How about an invisible, high amp, force field like the kind used in Star Trek. I’ll go build one, brb…
    I'll take one as well!

  22. #22
    Lively Member morrowasted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    118
    I could GUARENTEE you I could cross the boarder back and forth without being detected. There is just no way in hell they're going to cover that HUGE ass boarder.
    wanna bet 20 bucks?

    -morrowasted

  23. #23
    KrisSiegel.com Kasracer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    USA, Maryland
    Posts
    4,985
    Originally posted by morrowasted
    wanna bet 20 bucks?
    Buy me a plane ticket to Mexico, money for a rental car, and a helicopter to take me to an airport when I get across as well as a plane ticket back to Maryland, then a Limo to drive me back to my house.

    Pay for all that and I'll bet you $20 I could do it.

  24. #24
    Fanatic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Posts
    770
    Sure. Because you don't look MEXICAN. Haven't you heard of Profiling?!?

  25. #25
    KrisSiegel.com Kasracer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    USA, Maryland
    Posts
    4,985
    Originally posted by nkad
    Sure. Because you don't look MEXICAN. Haven't you heard of Profiling?!?
    You cannot be serious. Do you even know what the boundry line is like?

  26. #26
    Fanatic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Posts
    770
    Yes I do. I mean they are still going to ask for your passport/photo ID or what not. Ask where you are going and your reasons for being in Mexico. If they have resonable doupt that you shouldn't be in a certain place then they can further question you (I would assume)

  27. #27
    KrisSiegel.com Kasracer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    USA, Maryland
    Posts
    4,985
    Originally posted by nkad
    Yes I do. I mean they are still going to ask for your passport/photo ID or what not. Ask where you are going and your reasons for being in Mexico. If they have resonable doupt that you shouldn't be in a certain place then they can further question you (I would assume)
    ............

    Do you even KNOW how illegal immagrants get here?

  28. #28
    Your Ad Here! Edneeis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Moreno Valley, CA (SoCal)
    Posts
    7,339
    You ****ing nazis must have forgot how America started. Anyone ever here of the American dream? I guess that only applies to white people. And Shawn N obviously doesn't know **** about business to think they are cutting that kind of profit. Your answer is to just pay more for **** jobs that white folk wont do anyhow. Then the company stops making a profit and goes away then white and brown folks are out of work. Beside a lot of times America still profits since, depending on how they are paid they may still pay taxes or their employer does even though they receive no benefit from said taxes. I think you should be born in a village where there is no work or you have a family that you can't even feed. Tell me what lengths you wont go to to feed them. Even if that means having to go far away and live and work in **** ass conditions to earn what would be a **** ass living by american standards just so you can send money back home to feed your family or give them a chance at something better. Americans are so selfish, we never think of the other guy. And a land of immigrants worried about immigration, huh.

  29. #29

    Thread Starter
    Frenzied Member Shawn N's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    1,631
    Saying "Nazis" is waaaay to over the edge. I'm not a xenophobe. I have no problems with people from other countries coming into the US. All I'm saying is come into the country legally and when you're in MY COUNTRY, pick up your slack and earn your f-in way. Don't come here and pick up the welfare buck that American tax payers will pick up - that's total s**t.

    Edneeis: that was just a number of the top of the head. And after actually working for an employer that hired illegal immigrants but still working the numbers in the place, I think I have a good idea what I'm talking about.

    I know that 40% is way over the top, but that's not the point. The point is that businesses (mind you this is in South Texas) would not be paying the extremely low wage if they knew that people other than illegal's wouldn't do it. It's the same as outsourcing and as a coder from CA, you oughta know what I'm talking about.

    Again: I have no problem with people from other countries. How could I? Both of my parent's are immigrants. However, they both entered the States legally and made their fair share of impact on the economy.

    drunk
    Last edited by Shawn N; Jan 9th, 2004 at 03:46 AM.
    Please rate my post.

  30. #30
    Hyperactive Member Maven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Greeneville, TN
    Posts
    322
    Well if you don't know why this is a bad thing then your a complete dumbass about economics.

    Many of those mexicans will come here to work for a while then return home and start a business. Money here has a lot more vaule back in mexico because their cost of living is a lot cheaper then ours. Thus these people are willing to work for under minimum wage.

    You have a flood of people willing to work for under minimum wage. Companies hire those people to get the job done cheaper and improve their bottom line. Americans who have been here all their lives will suffer because they'll have to start working at those low ass wages but they cant go home to make a business like the illegals, they have to stay here and live in poverty.
    Education is an admirable thing, but it is well to remember from time to time that nothing that is worth knowing can be taught. - Oscar Wilde

  31. #31
    Fanatic Member davebat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    727
    are all americans silly?

  32. #32
    Fanatic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Posts
    770
    Dude kasracer, i was refering to the damn sections of the border that allow traffic to flow.

  33. #33
    Fanatic Member JPicasso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Kalamazoo, MI
    Posts
    843
    Problem is, Bush isn't a conservative, he's a repblican, and a politian first.
    Much like ::shudder:: Clinton was.

    Illegal amnesty?
    Steel tariffs?
    Farm bailouts?
    Medicare entilements?

    He panders to the largest voter population apparently.
    And still has to address the Iraqi invasion.
    (yes, yes, world a better place without him, but ends don't justify the action, does it?)

    Problem is, ain't no way I'm voting for Dean. and there is no serious contenders on the
    republican primaries. suxor!
    Merry Christmas

  34. #34
    Super Moderator Shaggy Hiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    40,106
    nkad, what kas was saying is that you can walk across the border with ease. Nobody will ask you what your business is. He would have an easy time of it crossing at a guarded border, while a Mexican national might have a harder time, but with a long border such as we have, only the desert heat is an obstacle. Considering how much traveling I have done by foot, I don't even think of a border as just the guarded points, and I doubt any illegal would either. Fair amount of drug traffic through the Sonoran desert, too, so immigrants aren't the only ones crossing the border.

    I have worked with Mexican and Bosnian immigrants, and found them to be industrious people. A lot of low paying jobs can't be filled by Americans with similar work ethics. Of course we could pay more, but since I'm in government, you know who is doing the paying.....you are. We live in a country where goods and services are pretty cheap. Most anybody can afford a car, a tv, and other basic luxuries. I've been caving in some of the poorest parts of this country, and everybody has a car (up on blocks, but it's a car) and a tv. Our food is cheap, and gas is cheaper than any beverage except water. If we raise the lowest wages, we may not fill the jobs with Americans, but we will spend more. I don't know what is right on this issue, but I don't begrudge the immigrants a chance to make minimum wage.

  35. #35
    Hyperactive Member Maven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Greeneville, TN
    Posts
    322
    Originally posted by JPicasso
    Problem is, Bush isn't a conservative, he's a repblican, and a politian first.
    Much like ::shudder:: Clinton was.

    Illegal amnesty?
    Steel tariffs?
    Farm bailouts?
    Medicare entilements?

    He panders to the largest voter population apparently.
    And still has to address the Iraqi invasion.
    (yes, yes, world a better place without him, but ends don't justify the action, does it?)

    Problem is, ain't no way I'm voting for Dean. and there is no serious contenders on the
    republican primaries. suxor!
    One word: Clark
    Education is an admirable thing, but it is well to remember from time to time that nothing that is worth knowing can be taught. - Oscar Wilde

  36. #36
    Frenzied Member Memnoch1207's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    DUH, Guess...Hint: It's really hot!
    Posts
    1,861
    I think the whole issue is if an immigrant enters the US illegally then they should be deported. There are procedures that must be adhered to when entering this country, such as, making sure your aren't a criminal or carrying a deadly contagious disease, like SARS.

    I agree with Edneeis on the fact that people come to this country for the "American Dream", but if you come here, don't swim across a river and climb a wall to do it.

    What Bush is proposing is to pretty much give immunity to all immigrants that are currently in the country illegally. I like Bush, but that part of his proposal I do not agree with.

    The real issue is the legality of their entrance into this country.
    Being educated does not make you intelligent.

    Need a weekend getaway??? Come Visit

  37. #37
    Your Ad Here! Edneeis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Moreno Valley, CA (SoCal)
    Posts
    7,339
    Maybe I was a bit harsh but I have a strong opinion on the matter. This plan was initially started before 9/11 when President Fox come over and got buddy buddy with Bush, but then 9/11 happened and the borders were of a different concern. I think the legal way to get into this country should be revised then especially for our neighboring Canada and Mexico. Also I think it is the greater good to help people from other countries regardless of how they enter the country. Illegals that work here and send money home could eventally help their own country to achieve financial stability and thus remove the need to leave Mexico to find gainful or any employment. This also solves the problem of illegal immigrants and I'm sure Americas role in that would be remembered. Its a bit like filesharing, its going to happen regardless, so you might as well embrace it and find a way to comprimise. If I really thought that Americans would do most of the jobs that they usually do then maybe I'd have more sympathy. To me most Americans are saying hey all the mexicans are stealing our jobs, but if you said ok then you do it they'd say no I don't want to do it, I just don't want them doing it or give me more money.

    I'm a fan of competition in business. Its nice when two competitors duke it out with each other for market share and lower prices in the process. Its nice because as a consumer I reap the reward. This is a similiar situation only the shoe is on the other foot and its American works that are faced with competition only instead of stepping up to the challenge they would rather eliminate the competition. Grant it there are other more legal forms of competition.

    Outsourcing sucks if you are American but not if you are Indian or whomever is on the receiving end of it. That is the nature of business to make profit not to make employees profitable. Unforunately we as consumers always wanting lower prices have had a part in outsourcing.

    I'll get down off the soap box now. I do apologize for the Nazi comment.
    Last edited by Edneeis; Jan 9th, 2004 at 11:18 AM.

  38. #38
    KrisSiegel.com Kasracer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    USA, Maryland
    Posts
    4,985
    Originally posted by nkad
    Dude kasracer, i was refering to the damn sections of the border that allow traffic to flow.
    Why would you!? We are talking about illegals, why the hell would you even THINK about those parts of it?

  39. #39
    Hyperactive Member Juan Carlos Rey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Mendoza, Argentina
    Posts
    301
    Do you know what NAFTA is?
    NAFTA is gasoline in Spanish.
    There are many similar trades, Mercosur, ALCA, LALALC, etc.
    And yes, I know what NAFTA is.
    And bilaterality seems to work only one way.
    And I'm a little bored.
    Bye.
    Combat poverty: kill a poor!!

  40. #40

    Thread Starter
    Frenzied Member Shawn N's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    1,631
    Maybe because you had no point.
    Please rate my post.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  



Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width