|
-
Aug 7th, 2003, 09:12 AM
#1
Thread Starter
New Member
-
Aug 7th, 2003, 10:46 AM
#2
Fanatic Member
You need 3 equations to solve 3 variables. You need to find a third equation (and don't change x+y=z to 2x+2y=2z) to solve it.
Right now all you can do is get things like x = 5 + 2y instead of x = 3y + 4 + z. You can only eliminate one variable because you only have 2 equations.
Don't pay attention to this signature, it's contradictory.
-
Aug 7th, 2003, 11:09 AM
#3
Thread Starter
New Member
I've solved it now 
I approached it in 2D. I had coordinates that lay on each line. I ignored the z axis to start with and found the equation of each line in the form y = mx + c. Then found the gradient and intercept and put these two equations equal to each other to find the X,Y coordinates of where they cross.
Then it was easy to find the halfway point in the z axis.
Problem ended up being a lot simpler than I thought.
Stu
-
Aug 8th, 2003, 05:33 PM
#4
Fanatic Member
Is this resolved or are you looking for another answer?
"Can't" and "shouldn't" are two totally separate things.
All questions should be answered. All answers should be true. That is why I post.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|