If you mean writing a program like TelNet.....I was looking for the commands before, I fonud something but I deleted it at the end I'm not sure, but search pscode, they have some telnet clients that you can see...
rate my posts if they help ya!
Extract thumbnail without reading the whole image file: (C# - VB)
Apply texture to bitmaps: (C# - VB)
Extended console library: (VB)
Save JPEG with a certain quality (image compression): (C# - VB ) VB.NET to C# conversion tips!!
I imagine writing a telnet client would be very simple (certainly easier then writing a chat program). All you need is some basic WinSock knowledge, as all you are really doing is sending strings back and forth. When you recieve data from the server (using WinSock), just dump it into a textbox (its all text, of course), and when you want to send a command, you can use a separate box, and just send the text in that box.
Writing a telnet server is a bit harder, but not much. You are still just sending strings to the client, and deciding what to do with the strings that the client sends back.
ha ha ha,
You want the Telnet commands? well that is funny!
Anyway, there is nothing called telnet commands. Telnet was an Internet browser for Unix, but it is now also installed with Windows. The program is used to communicate with other computers\servers.
Telnet is not used for one thing. You can use it to do many and many things. You can hack a a server using telnet. You can send emails, and even "Fake" emails from anybody ==> anybody.
You can use it as a client for "Sub7" if you've ever heard of that. You can chat with your friend using telnet. You can hack your ISP , oh and many many things ...
By the way, I've noticed somebody telling something about how to program telnet? Well, I can do that within 60 seconds using the Winsock control. Hell! it does not need any programming!!!
Anyway, I welcome any questions about the uses of Telnet! And if you need any help in hacking using this, I can help too! I know anybody wouldn't ask for this kinda of stuff until he is looking for hacking things! he he he he
Actually, there are far more legitimate uses for telnet. I personally use it to administer my Linux server remotely, since it happens to be a blinking box with no monitor. I use it to program on remote computers, and other such things.
You can also use BBSs, online directories, etc.
As I posted last, writing telnet software would take about 60 seconds.
And I doubt that asking about telnet has anything to do with hacking.
It is not correct that you just use the winsock and you recieve data from the server (using WinSock), and just dump it into a textbox ,because not all of you receive it is a text.
There is something called Telnet protocol which includes negotiations and commmands.
Writing a Telnet progarm is not easy as you think.
You have to implement the Telnet protocol since it is a layer 7 protocol.
I am sure that writing a telnet client is somehow complex as you have to implement the telnet protocol.
You can find the telnet protocol specifications in the RFCs
Please read the attachement and tell me what do you think.
It is just one of many RFCs for the telnet protocol.
hmm,
I don't know what to tell you,
Telnet was improved in various ways by various OS's, however let's say the very "typcial" telnet does not need any protocol, because it the PROTOCOL itself.
When you use Winsock, you don't send signals for establishing a TCP connection (Handshaking), becuase you just connect because it is TCP.
Maybe you misunderstood my because you're talking about newer/older/Other telnet client. I am talking about Windows' which is the same as Unix, what's yours buddy?
Originally posted by Gtarawneh hmm,
I don't know what to tell you,
Telnet was improved in various ways by various OS's, however let's say the very "typcial" telnet does not need any protocol, because it the PROTOCOL itself.
When you use Winsock, you don't send signals for establishing a TCP connection (Handshaking), becuase you just connect because it is TCP.
Maybe you misunderstood my because you're talking about newer/older/Other telnet client. I am talking about Windows' which is the same as Unix, what's yours buddy?
Uhn.
You are mixing up a raw tcp connection with telnet.
They are not the same.
Telnet is a terminal emulator.
It emulates a dumb terminal (eg. VT100, VT52 etc.) connected to a back-end unix box.
So those dumb terminals could have very simple graphics made up of characters.
The screens had fields, so you could tab around the screen etc.
Telnet is not just a raw text protocol.
Also, telnet is used for connecting to remote machines normally for administration purposes.
I telnet to our server in the states very often for administrative work.
Telnet is not designed for hacking.
In theory one could hack using telnet, but not anymore.
Most security holes have been covered up in systems.
Microsoft MVP : Visual Developer - Visual Basic [2004-2005]
By the way, I don't want to talk about hacking, but for aknowledgement : as more as system adminstrators add more and more improvements to their servers for protection, the more they bring up holes for hacking.
Gtarawneh thats absolutley wrong. I use telnet everyday to test routers. I am in a cisco class and we have to configure the routers with telnet all the time. Yes you can hack using port 23 but like plenderj said its for remote connections mainly. (translation sitting at home f-ing around because you have a remote connex to your box at work- so instead of going there you can be home relaxing)
•º£ëÖº•
____________________________
If you run alot no matter if you like to or not, it grows on you.... Visual basic has yet to grow on me!
No,
you're mistaken pal.
Hacking coinsides with programming, maybe fools or "idiots" like you don't know this.
Anyway, Nobody asked you to decide wither I am a hacker or not, only my abilities decide.
Originally posted by Gtarawneh No,
you're mistaken pal.
Hacking coinsides with programming, maybe fools or "idiots" like you don't know this.
Anyway, Nobody asked you to decide wither I am a hacker or not, only my abilities decide.
Using such trojans as Sub7 and things like that is not hacking.
And yes hacking does have to do with programming, but you've already displayed that you don't really know all that much.
I've known quite a few hackers to date actually.
I used to hang out with a lot during my days on IRC.
So people from X-Org, Warlords, tribe (tbe) etc.
They were true hackers.
They discovered the exploits on systems, teardrop, smurf, bonk, boink, also I suppose the OOB nuke etc.
So I do know about hacking.
Also being the senior network administrator of two seperate networks that have never to date been exploited, I think I know my stuff.
Microsoft MVP : Visual Developer - Visual Basic [2004-2005]
Ha!
You think me one of those kiddies playing around with Sub7? You really deserve to be on the site, and I've updated it now, check it!
Then what's your damn server? I will prove you something ... You're a big idiot !
Originally posted by Gtarawneh Ha!
You think me one of those kiddies playing around with Sub7? You really deserve to be on the site, and I've updated it now, check it!
Then what's your damn server? I will prove you something ... You're a big idiot !
pffft.
try me.
... or would you like me to give you my IP address first ?
Microsoft MVP : Visual Developer - Visual Basic [2004-2005]
ThankS for the IP, but it will enable me to disconnect you from the Internet, so what?
But the most important is to know your server. Lets see, so what's your server pal?
Originally posted by Gtarawneh ThankS for the IP, but it will enable me to disconnect you from the Internet, so what?
But the most important is to know your server. Lets see, so what's your server pal?
192.168.1.1 as you can see :
Code:
Microsoft Windows 2000 [Version 5.00.2195]
(C) Copyright 1985-1999 Microsoft Corp.
C:\>ping ntserver
Pinging ntserver [192.168.1.1] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=128
Ping statistics for 192.168.1.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms
C:\>
Microsoft MVP : Visual Developer - Visual Basic [2004-2005]
Originally posted by Gtarawneh Oh Idiots,
You exchange silly jokes, UFFF
It seems that you liked that page, hope you've visited the link for idiots like you!
Ha ha ha,
monkies are good man, at least they are not ugly as you are nad_scorp.
he he he
oh look its mr.popular back to tell us all what idiots we are.
Gtarawneh, we've dedicated a thread to you in chit-chat
Also, I can't help but notice that my server is still running.
Microsoft MVP : Visual Developer - Visual Basic [2004-2005]