Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Stopping Spam, which one maybe safer?

Threaded View

  1. #1

    Thread Starter
    Frenzied Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Gammapolis
    Posts
    1,474

    Stopping Spam, which one maybe safer?

    I dont know if this is a right forum to ask the question or not, but hope someone help me.
    Am desiging a web site that holds the information for many ppl. In fact their email address should be present at the page so people can mail them. I have three choices
    1- Put a link for their email address :mailto:....
    2- Explicity write the email address without any link.
    3- Explicity write the email address, providing the link mailto:...

    If the viewer of the site wants to email the person and does not wish to use his mail client like outlook express, then:
    In case 1: he has to read the link property or click on it to open its mail client and then copy paste the address in his own mail box.
    In case 2: He simply copy pastes the address.
    In case 3: He may copy paste the address or choose to send mail using default mail clinet.

    Considering ease of use to me it seems case 3 is the best choice.
    But here comes the problem of spammers. I dont know how deep they dig into the web pages to find email addresses. Do they just read the text, or go deep into the html code and extract emails?
    So which one of the above can better avoid spams?

    Thanks
    Last edited by Lunatic3; May 16th, 2003 at 01:30 AM.
    'Heading for the automatic overload'
    Marillion, Brave, The Great Escape, 1994

    'How will WE stand the FIRE TOMORROW?'
    Eloy, Silent Cries and Mighty Echoes, The Vision - Burning, 1979

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  



Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width