For Idiots Who Use Google To Form Opinions ...

[honeybee]

I remember a tit talking of Indian government's atrocities against the Kashmiri people who advised me to search it on Google. Here's what that tit should see:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=%22US+Human+Rights+Violations%22



Maybe if he wants to grow up, he should also read this:
http://www.rediff.com/news/2003/mar/28jk1.htm

.

[Xanith]

For every story you drag up I can drag up 100 more to support my opinion. Its obvious the atrocities committed by your government in Kashmir. It's recognized across the world by many organizations. I just found it amusing how you are quick to criticize the US when your own government is obviously killing and torturing innocent civilians.

As I said before you’re a hypocrite. And your opinions about things are based on an emotional and illogical speculation you form in your own mind. You constantly repeat disproven and debunked theories that you present. You conveniently ignore facts and refuse to even debate with people when you know you’re wrong by calling them ignorant or uninformed.

I think everyone here reading what you write doesn't take you too seriously. I know I don't. Your more like an episode of Jerry Springer, you know what you are seeing is a bunch of crap but you can’t help it but watch :)

X

[honeybee]

Some conclusions:

1. You believe the US is innocent of the human rights violation? The Google disproves this. If you believe Google, then the US is as guilty as any other nation, so you don't have any right to speak about India, going by your own rule. If you don't believe Google, kindly get informed, through the means I have already told you, and then try to debate.

2. I believe Jerry Springer is American.

.

[venerable bede]

BOMB MECCA

[Serge]

Originally posted by honeybee
Some conclusions:

1. You believe the US is innocent of the human rights violation? The Google disproves this. If you believe Google, then the US is as guilty as any other nation, so you don't have any right to speak about India, going by your own rule. If you don't believe Google, kindly get informed, through the means I have already told you, and then try to debate.

2. I believe Jerry Springer is American.

.

Google has no opinion what so ever. It is merely a search engine that will search trough "posts/sites" that regual people made.

[Maven]

Originally posted by honeybee
I remember a tit talking of Indian government's atrocities against the Kashmiri people who advised me to search it on Google. Here's what that tit should see:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=%22US+Human+Rights+Violations%22



Maybe if he wants to grow up, he should also read this:
http://www.rediff.com/news/2003/mar/28jk1.htm

.

Google is a good research tool, there is quite a few search engines that feed out of thier index, for example yahoo.

[Pc_Madness]

Honeybee, whats your excuse for India test firing another nuclear capable missile?

[honeybee]

Originally posted by Serge
Google has no opinion what so ever. It is merely a search engine that will search trough "posts/sites" that regual people made.

Exactly my point. Just because I found 500-odd links mentioning America and Human Rights Violation, I don't call the US a human rights violating country. I merely think that "OK, so there've been cases of human rights violation against the US, and a few other leading countries too." I have not called the US names because of those 500 links. Therefore I need some concrete proof, and not the google search results, to debate if the Indian government is a human rights violator. That's all I wanted to point out.

PC_Madness, in view of the fact that our sworn enemy is armed with nukes, and has expressed intentions of its use at the drop of a hat, I personally think we should do everything within our powers to see that any attack by our enemy will be met with an equal or stronger counter-attack. Also when you are discussing the missile program or nuclear programme, remember that ever since we acquired the capability of producing nuclear weapons, we have maintained that we shall never strike first with the nukes. That means we won't go for pre-emptive nuke strikes. India will use nuclear weapons only if they are used against her.

Secondly I think our government has a time-bound program for increasing the range and firepower of missiles, and it's in keeping with this program that we are test-firing this missile.

Thirdly, our government has not supplied the nuclear technology to other countries, as against Pakistan which exchanged their nuclear technology with North Korea for missiles. Surprising to see you are not asking about Pakistan's motives behind test-firing another missile of theirs :rolleyes:

.

[Pc_Madness]

Did your country tell its neighbours that it would be performing a test of a nuclear-capable missile?

[honeybee]

... as against Pakistan which exchanged their nuclear technology with North Korea for missiles. Surprising to see you are not asking about Pakistan's motives behind test-firing another missile of theirs :rolleyes:

.

[Pc_Madness]

Originally posted by Pc_Madness
Did your country tell its neighbours that it would be performing a test of a nuclear-capable missile?

You seem to have forgotten my question HoneyBee. :rolleyes:

[honeybee]

Originally posted by Pc_Madness
You seem to have forgotten my question HoneyBee. :rolleyes:

I haven't forgotten the question. Only I am waiting for certain answers before I decide to reply to that question.

.

[OrdinaryGuy]

Originally posted by Pc_Madness
Did your country tell its neighbours that it would be performing a test of a nuclear-capable missile?

So if Pakistan claims India did not inform it of a missile test, it is true? :rolleyes:

[honeybee]

Originally posted by OrdinaryGuy
So if Pakistan claims India did not inform it of a missile test, it is true? :rolleyes:

Forget it, dude, some people are learning the politician's ploy, turning your attention to other matters when they can't explain the matter at hand :rolleyes:

.