Click to See Complete Forum and Search --> : Enough talk. Let's start the killing!
Suzzi
Feb 15th, 2003, 02:24 PM
I'm a bit confused by why we let the Iraqi's have any weapons at all. I mean, apparently they are allowed to fire missiles that go for 150 miles......
Well, they could easily sell these to Canada, Mexico or Madagasca, and then they would be within striking distance of the USA. I think this is a very dangerous situation and we shouldn't be allowing them to even own knives. Some might argue that they need knives to cut up their pork etc., but I scoff at such remarks. If we civilised them, then they could eat Pizza, and then they would only need those circular pizza cutter thingies. Or they could just buy electric knives, then they would have to stay near power sockets.
No War!
Feb 15th, 2003, 02:30 PM
Originally posted by Suzzi
Well, they could easily sell these to Canada, Mexico or Madagasca, and then they would be within striking distance of the USA.
There's no need to sell them outside the USA. They can be used by anti-abortus people as well.....
nishantp
Feb 15th, 2003, 02:43 PM
Pretty sure everyone knows who you are by now...:p
No War!
Feb 15th, 2003, 03:00 PM
Well, who am I?
Let me give you a hint: I haven't been on Visual Basic Forums before.
Jamie-Lee
Feb 15th, 2003, 03:02 PM
this whole thing is like so totally stupid. i don't get it
No War!
Feb 15th, 2003, 03:24 PM
I don't understand why there are people supporting ware anyway.
In every *****ing war, innocent people get killed.
So people who support war, support murdering.
So in essence, they are murderers themself.
No-one would want to admit he/she is a murderer, right?
nishantp
Feb 15th, 2003, 04:24 PM
Originally posted by No War!
I don't understand why there are people supporting ware anyway.
In every *****ing war, innocent people get killed.
So people who support war, support murdering.
So in essence, they are murderers themself.
No-one would want to admit he/she is a murderer, right? Lol. That is the most simplistic view point i've ever heard. I suppose that everyone should have let the Nazis take over Europe in order to avoid a war right? Thats good stuff.
You need to come up some other way of getting attention.
No War!
Feb 15th, 2003, 04:48 PM
No, I'm just against killing innocent Iraqis.
If Bush really just wanted a change of regime, all they need is a sniper with 10 bullets, for Saddam and his doubles.
But I understand of course, Bush isn't just after change of regime, he's after the oil. And he just wants another Gulf war, to make his father proud of him......
nishantp
Feb 15th, 2003, 04:56 PM
Originally posted by No War!
No, I'm just against killing innocent Iraqis.
If Bush really just wanted a change of regime, all they need is a sniper with 10 bullets, for Saddam and his doubles.
But I understand of course, Bush isn't just after change of regime, he's after the oil. And he just wants another Gulf war, to make his father proud of him...... Once more a very simplistic viewpoint. Oil may well be an issue, but it is far from the only one. The US currently gets 6% of its oil from Iraq. If all they wanted was oil, they would invade Venezuela. The people of that country hate their president (who won't step down).
I generally believe that assassinating Saddam would be the best course of action in the short term...but what kind of precedent would that set? People like you would be the first to say "Who does the US think they are killing the leaders of other countries?"
Suzzi
Feb 15th, 2003, 05:20 PM
Originally posted by nishantp
I generally believe that assassinating Saddam would be the best course of action in the short term...but what kind of precedent would that set? People like you would be the first to say "Who does the US think they are killing the leaders of other countries?"
In fairness, it would then open up the point that an Iraqi could legitametly assassinate the US President, and there would appear to be very little recourse in that case..... but I digress.
What about these bloody Kurds! Should we let them have their Way? Or do we need to send in little Miss Muffitt again?
snakeeyes1000
Feb 15th, 2003, 07:10 PM
you'd trust them with those pizza cutter things? that's what they want... they're lying, they don't need to eat. they choose to live in a desert, for crying out loud. let em eat the sand
dogsby
Feb 15th, 2003, 10:44 PM
We need to make Iraq a huge parking lot. just a few well placed nukes and KAPOW! instant flat land for parking, Or build a big mall or something. Oh by the way, there will be 1000's of american deaths by chemicals/biologicals. Of course the iraqis will be alive since they will surrender like they did in gulf war 1, and america will keep them fed, provide medicine etc, so they can live to kill more people another day.
Dogsby
Nuke em all
Skitchen8
Feb 16th, 2003, 12:22 PM
Originally posted by No War!
I don't understand why there are people supporting ware anyway.
In every *****ing war, innocent people get killed.
So people who support war, support murdering.
So in essence, they are murderers themself.
No-one would want to admit he/she is a murderer, right? i support murdering, i'll gladly admit i support murdering of innocent people... for example the list of people i would like to kill:
neo-nazi's
people who are smarter than me
ugly lesbians
gays
hot lesbians who don't video tape the action
people who sell me ****ty weed laced with dog **** or something (im going to find this ****er)
people who don't like rap
anybody have a gun i can borrow
Suzzi
Feb 16th, 2003, 12:34 PM
Originally posted by Skitchen8
i support murdering, i'll gladly admit i support murdering of innocent people... for example the list of people i would like to kill:
neo-nazi's
people who are smarter than me
ugly lesbians
gays
hot lesbians who don't video tape the action
people who sell me ****ty weed laced with dog **** or something (im going to find this ****er)
people who don't like rap
oh, and people with more than three vowels in their surname. Smug Bastards!
vbNeo
Feb 16th, 2003, 12:42 PM
Originally posted by Suzzi
I'm a bit confused by why we let the Iraqi's have any weapons at all. I mean, apparently they are allowed to fire missiles that go for 150 miles......
Well, they could easily sell these to Canada, Mexico or Madagasca, and then they would be within striking distance of the USA. I think this is a very dangerous situation and we shouldn't be allowing them to even own knives. Some might argue that they need knives to cut up their pork etc., but I scoff at such remarks. If we civilised them, then they could eat Pizza, and then they would only need those circular pizza cutter thingies. Or they could just buy electric knives, then they would have to stay near power sockets.
You know what ? That's EXACTLY what we did to german after WW1, and you know how that went ? well PRETTY bad!
Doing that would just help building up a bigger hatred to the western world, thereby making the danger bigger. Trust me, if terrorists wants weapons, they'll get em'!
This isn't a simple as it seems, even though it might looks so!
Cheers !
Suzzi
Feb 16th, 2003, 12:54 PM
Originally posted by vbNeo
You know what ? That's EXACTLY what we did to german after WW1, and you know how that went ? well PRETTY bad!
Doing that would just help building up a bigger hatred to the western world, thereby making the danger bigger. Trust me, if terrorists wants weapons, they'll get em'!
This isn't a simple as it seems, even though it might looks so!
Cheers !
Well, if the Germans were that dangerous in WWII with pizza cutters, think how dangerous they would have been if they had access to real weapons? I think we had a lucky escape there. It's just as well we disarmed them.
vbNeo
Feb 16th, 2003, 12:59 PM
You know what started WW2 ?? The disarming, Germany became a BIG mess, inflation took over the country, and chaos ruled!
What we was to do with Germany, was to help them rise from "the filth" and make them work again.
Which we also did after WW2. BUT what i'm trying to say is, total disarming won't help, it'll just make the situation worse
Cheers !
Suzzi
Feb 16th, 2003, 01:15 PM
Originally posted by vbNeo
You know what started WW2 ?? The disarming, Germany became a BIG mess, inflation took over the country, and chaos ruled!
What we was to do with Germany, was to help them rise from "the filth" and make them work again.
Which we also did after WW2. BUT what i'm trying to say is, total disarming won't help, it'll just make the situation worse
Cheers !
But, if, as you say we had disarmed the Germans, how could they bomb Pearl Harbour? Where did they get the planes from?
vbNeo
Feb 16th, 2003, 01:31 PM
Don't you know ANY history!?
THE JAPANS BOMBED PEARL HARBOR !!!
Germany used SPADES to train there soldiers !
Cheers!
Suzzi
Feb 16th, 2003, 01:34 PM
Originally posted by vbNeo
Don't you know ANY history!?
THE JAPANS BOMBED PEARL HARBOR !!!
Germany used SPADES to train there soldiers !
Cheers!
Did they? Oh, sorry, I never knew that.
If the Germans where armed with Spades, why didn't the allies just shoot them from a distance before they got close enough to "spade" them.
vbNeo
Feb 16th, 2003, 01:38 PM
Maybe you should have listened a "little" more in the history lessons ay ?
Well, germany was allowed to have about 1000 weapons... They then trained 1000 of that times "Marines" and actually invaded another country, that gave them a bigger supply of weapons to take on a new country and so on.
Cheers !
mendhak
Feb 16th, 2003, 01:39 PM
There's something not right about this, but I can't tell what. :confused:
Anony
Feb 16th, 2003, 01:41 PM
Originally posted by vbNeo
Maybe you should have listened a "little" more in the history lessons ay ?
Well, germany was allowed to have about 1000 weapons... They then trained 1000 of that times "Marines" and actually invaded another country, that gave them a bigger supply of weapons to take on a new country and so on.
Cheers !
So they invaded poland with a thousand shovels ? :confused:
vbNeo
Feb 16th, 2003, 01:44 PM
READ what i wrote, they had 1 thousand RIFLES
Cheers!
Suzzi
Feb 16th, 2003, 01:45 PM
Originally posted by vbNeo
They then trained 1000 of that times "Marines" and actually invaded another country
Oh, thanks I never knew that either. What country did they invade. I always thought that Germany was part of mainland Europe (though I could be wrong). So why would they use Marines and not soldiers to attack a neighbouring country. Or was this when they conquered Britain (that used to be an island didn't it?)
Anony
Feb 16th, 2003, 01:45 PM
Then why would they use shovels to train their soldiers ? Digging up old ammunition ? On the spot brain surgery ? Or whack an unsuspecting ally tank into submission ?
Some things are not clear here ...
vbNeo
Feb 16th, 2003, 01:48 PM
Originally posted by Suzzi
Oh, thanks I never knew that either. What country did they invade. I always thought that Germany was part of mainland Europe (though I could be wrong). So why would they use Marines and not soldiers to attack a neighbouring country. Or was this when they conquered Britain (that used to be an island didn't it?)
Well the marines were tougher and better, much better trained for warfare, than the standard German soldier, and they never invaded britain. Britain was the last free country in Europe when US FINALLY arrived, hehe
Cheers
vbNeo
Feb 16th, 2003, 01:49 PM
Originally posted by Anony
Then why would they use shovels to train their soldiers ? Digging up old ammunition ? On the spot brain surgery ? Or whack an unsuspecting ally tank into submission ?
Some things are not clear here ...
They trained a big army with the spades BEFORE they got weapons, so they would actually have a fully trained and big army done when they would have access to real weapons
Cheers !
Anony
Feb 16th, 2003, 01:49 PM
the marines never invaded Britain ? Then who did ? Wasn't there that bit with spitting fire and Mrs. Smith ?
Skitchen8
Feb 16th, 2003, 01:50 PM
Originally posted by vbNeo
You know what started WW2 ?? The disarming, Germany became a BIG mess, inflation took over the country, and chaos ruled!
What we was to do with Germany, was to help them rise from "the filth" and make them work again.
Which we also did after WW2. BUT what i'm trying to say is, total disarming won't help, it'll just make the situation worse
Cheers ! one flaw in your logic there, because the whole world ignored what should have started WW2 earlier because germany was important to the world. We didn't help rearm them, we gave them the funding to do it themselves, and we helped them not only because we felt they needed help, but because of the fact that world needed them because they were between the democratic nations and the communist russian empire. They acted as a bumper, so france and britian figured that germany should be allowed a little more land if they want, because they are the only thing keeping russia from them
Suzzi
Feb 16th, 2003, 01:51 PM
I could have sworn that Britain got invaded. Wasn't it the first time since that chap called Norman invaded in 1066?
vbNeo
Feb 16th, 2003, 01:52 PM
They didn't invade britain!
The got a heck of a lot V1 bombs in, but the spits(SpitFire's some of the fastest and most agile planes at the time) got most of them. Germany developed V2 however, which blew the half of London to bits!
Cheers !
Skitchen8
Feb 16th, 2003, 01:52 PM
Originally posted by vbNeo
Well the marines were tougher and better, much better trained for warfare, than the standard German soldier, and they never invaded britain. Britain was the last free country in Europe when US FINALLY arrived, hehe
Cheers and another correction, Sweden never got taken, along with a few other non-vital countries in Europe, when hitler enacted his plan for world domination, after all the world powers got taken over, he would conquer the rest of the countries, or they would submit before blitzkrieg could make them...
vbNeo
Feb 16th, 2003, 01:53 PM
Originally posted by Suzzi
I could have sworn that Britain got invaded. Wasn't it the first time since that chap called Norman invaded in 1066?
BRITAIN DID NOT GET INVADED !!!!!!!!
I'm sure of this !
Cheers !
vbNeo
Feb 16th, 2003, 01:54 PM
Originally posted by Skitchen8
and another correction, Sweden never got taken, along with a few other non-vital countries in Europe, when hitler enacted his plan for world domination, after all the world powers got taken over, he would conquer the rest of the countries, or they would submit before blitzkrieg could make them...
Well Sweden was neutral, and not a target for the Nazi germany because they didn't pose a threat, but almost all of the resisting europe got invaded
Cheers !
Anony
Feb 16th, 2003, 01:56 PM
Originally posted by Skitchen8
one flaw in your logic there, because the whole world ignored what should have started WW2 earlier because germany was important to the world. We didn't help rearm them, we gave them the funding to do it themselves, and we helped them not only because we felt they needed help, but because of the fact that world needed them because they were between the democratic nations and the communist russian empire. They acted as a bumper, so france and britian figured that germany should be allowed a little more land if they want, because they are the only thing keeping russia from them
That's right ! Just like that neigbourhood bully who smashed the warehouse. I didn't do it, I wasn't even there but I handed him the bricks.
Can't blame me for him chucking them through windows, can you ?
Skitchen8
Feb 16th, 2003, 01:56 PM
Britain did not get invaded, though it did get attacked the germans had not yet entered britain and attempted an attack, which they would have surely won
vbNeo
Feb 16th, 2003, 01:59 PM
Originally posted by Skitchen8
one flaw in your logic there, because the whole world ignored what should have started WW2 earlier because germany was important to the world. We didn't help rearm them, we gave them the funding to do it themselves, and we helped them not only because we felt they needed help, but because of the fact that world needed them because they were between the democratic nations and the communist russian empire. They acted as a bumper, so france and britian figured that germany should be allowed a little more land if they want, because they are the only thing keeping russia from them
Well i cannot argue with that, as you are completeky right !
Still i do not think a total disarming of iraq(which is kinda impossible by the way) would help, just make the situation worse. We do not have a Communist pressure theese days :D(we'll execpt north korea :eek: )
Anony
Feb 16th, 2003, 01:59 PM
eh ? Who won what now ?
vbNeo
Feb 16th, 2003, 02:01 PM
The allies AND russia won WW2, and that's when the cold war started out, europe was to be divided!
Cheers !
Skitchen8
Feb 16th, 2003, 02:02 PM
Originally posted by vbNeo
Well i cannot argue with that, as you are completeky right !
Still i do not think a total disarming of iraq(which is kinda impossible by the way) would help, just make the situation worse. We do not have a Communist pressure theese days :D(we'll execpt north korea :eek: ) Of course im right :D A total disarming of iraq would do absolutely nothing other than making their citizens starve because the government needed more money to make arms in secret. No commie pressures these days, and no need for bumpers much anymore, so lets go in and **** up iraq....
Suzzi
Feb 16th, 2003, 02:03 PM
Er, I'm a bit confused to? Did Germany invade Iraq? I think that must have been during the North African offensive. I remember doing this one in school. General Rommel on the german side, facing off across the desert against Britains Monty Python.
Anony
Feb 16th, 2003, 02:04 PM
Oh I remember, the treaty of Paranese where it was decided that Britain got the French, Spaniards and Portugese, the Russians got everything past the 59 th parallel and the rest were told that they were free.
The Americans got Japan and Australia.
And everyone was content, sent money to their partners and started making things. Mostly trouble.
vbNeo
Feb 16th, 2003, 02:04 PM
We still have North Korea, which is a more potential threat than Iraq, US should concentrate more resources on them, but it is as if they wouldn't dare do anything, maybe afraid of a 2. Vietnam ? who knows ?
Cheers!
Anony
Feb 16th, 2003, 02:06 PM
Yeah they should send them more food and drink. The North Koreans are hungry and the desert is creeping up their lands.
vbNeo
Feb 16th, 2003, 02:07 PM
Indeed, that might prevent them selling there nuclear weapons to international terrorists!!!!!
Cheers !!
Suzzi
Feb 16th, 2003, 02:09 PM
I think we should just do as the North Koreans ask and send them more food. Then everyone's happy.
And then, when we've lulled them into a false sense of security we should bomb South Korea. No one would ever expect that - whcih is why it is such a brilliant idea.
Anony
Feb 16th, 2003, 02:09 PM
They can't cross the desert because they've already eaten their camels. Do you know how heavy a missile is ? There's no way they could've carried it from Pakistan to Pyongyan on foot.
vbNeo
Feb 16th, 2003, 02:11 PM
Bomb south korea ?????
ARE YOU INSANE, YOU HAVE TO BE AN AMERICAN, IGNORANT ****.
Phew, sorry, just had a brief moment of extreme hatred ;). naa
we should bomb nobody, just try to get a peacefull solution. Are you so obsessed with war that you seek it ? you must be a sick being then. Furthermore SOUTH KOREA IS GOOD, NOT COMMUNISTIK!
Anony
Feb 16th, 2003, 02:13 PM
Pity they done away with it. It worked well until people started invading them :(
Suzzi
Feb 16th, 2003, 02:14 PM
Originally posted by vbNeo
Bomb south korea ?????
ARE YOU INSANE, YOU HAVE TO BE AN AMERICAN, IGNORANT ****.
Phew, sorry, just had a brief moment of extreme hatred ;). naa
we should bomb nobody, just try to get a peacefull solution. Are you so obsessed with war that you seek it ? you must be a sick being then. Furthermore SOUTH KOREA IS GOOD, NOT COMMUNISTIK!
How can South korea be good and North korea bad??? :confused: Surely they're all Korean's at the end of the day.
Besides, what's wrong with Communists? The Russians did pretty well out of it, look at the czars that where in power before John Lennon took over. They were right scallywags.
vbNeo
Feb 16th, 2003, 02:18 PM
You don't know ANYTHING it seems, therefor you are to be teached!
Communism is good in idea, but living the idea to life is bad, NO it did NOT go well for russia, actually the russian people has been starving to death, and the ZARS where there BEFORE the marxism(communism).
"How can South korea be good and North korea bad??? Surely they're all Korean's at the end of the day.
"
The country is divided into to ! like East and west germany, i suppose you know what THAT is!
Anony
Feb 16th, 2003, 02:20 PM
there's no east and west germany :confused:
vbNeo
Feb 16th, 2003, 02:21 PM
NO!!!!
It's not divided anymore !!! Everything sorted out, after the fall of the berlin wall in 1989!!!
Cheers!
Anony
Feb 16th, 2003, 02:24 PM
Ah yes. Can't they knock down the Iron wall in Korea ?
Suzzi
Feb 16th, 2003, 02:24 PM
Why did the Berlin wall fall down? Poor workmanship?
Maybe we should knock down the Korean wall instead of relying on the work of substandard contractors?
Suzzi
Feb 16th, 2003, 02:25 PM
Originally posted by Anony
Ah yes. Can't they knock down the Iron wall in Korea ?
That's what I just said! Cool we must be a pair of Genius's. Would that make us Geni?
Anony
Feb 16th, 2003, 02:29 PM
The berlin wall fell because of communism reacting with capitalism.
The Koreans are better in wall constructing. They made that big one along the Orange River up north !
Skitchen8
Feb 16th, 2003, 02:30 PM
my house has a wall who votes i knock it down??
Anony
Feb 16th, 2003, 02:31 PM
do you have communisms in your garden ? If yes you should knock him down !
cafeenman
Feb 16th, 2003, 02:33 PM
Originally posted by Anony
the marines never invaded Britain ? Then who did ? Wasn't there that bit with spitting fire and Mrs. Smith ?
Mrs. Smith lived far too long. She was a great lady, but eventually Folk Wolves ate her for lunch.
PS. As far as I know, Pearl Harbor was never bombed. Hawaii just happened to float under some falling bombs, so it was really Hawaii's fault. They should know better than to get in the way of a training exercise.
Anony
Feb 16th, 2003, 02:39 PM
vbNeo said it was the Germans who dropped shovels on the Japanese heads at Pearl Harbour ? :confused:
cafeenman
Feb 16th, 2003, 02:42 PM
Originally posted by Anony
vbNeo said it was the Germans who dropped shovels on the Japanese heads at Pearl Harbour ? :confused:
vbNeo has said a lot of things that weren't worth the effort to read. The term "spades" refers to the suit in a deck of cards. They used spades because they weren't obviously a weapon of war. Clubs are. Hearts are pacifists and diamonds are just too damned expensive to go around dropping on other countries.
vbNeo
Feb 16th, 2003, 02:47 PM
PEARL HARBOR WASNT BOMBED, ARE ALL YOU PEOPLE ****** !?
THERE ARE TAPES, SOUND RECORDINGS, AND TOMBSTONES, SURVIVORS AND WRECKS, OHHH YES MY FRIENDS, PEARL HARBOR WAS BOMBED, AND IT WAS DONE BY JAPAN!!!
TRY SEARCHING FOR IT, ASK ANY WORKER AT PEARL HARBOR TODAY, AND CAFEENMAN, YOU SAY MY STUFF SUCKS, READ AND LEARN SOMETHING!!!
CHEERS(I BLOODY GUESS)
vbNeo
Feb 16th, 2003, 02:49 PM
Originally posted by cafeenman
vbNeo has said a lot of things that weren't worth the effort to read. The term "spades" refers to the suit in a deck of cards. They used spades because they weren't obviously a weapon of war. Clubs are. Hearts are pacifists and diamonds are just too damned expensive to go around dropping on other countries.
They used spades to train there army, waht you are saying with pearl harbor is saying that there wasn't any ´KZ camps, youre FAR OUT!
history is my FAVORITE class in school, and has always been my main point of research, I KNOW STUFF, EVEN THOUGH I'M NOT VERY OLD !
Cheers
Suzzi
Feb 16th, 2003, 02:51 PM
I am a bit suspicious about your claim that the Germans practised with Shovels when they didn't have guns..... the two are totally different in weight and balance. Wouldn't they have been better off with sticks? I just have this mental image of German troops digging trenches with their new found rifles.
Originally posted by vbNeo
You don't know ANYTHING it seems, therefor you are to be teached!
Communism is good in idea, but living the idea to life is bad, NO it did NOT go well for russia, actually the russian people has been starving to death, and the ZARS where there BEFORE the marxism(communism).
"How can South korea be good and North korea bad??? Surely they're all Korean's at the end of the day.
"
The country is divided into to ! like East and west germany, i suppose you know what THAT is!
mmmmm. I learned lots about World War II in school. About all the battles, the espionage, the colonic irrigation etc. And about the people. I will forever have the image of the British President (Winston Churchill) rallying the troops before the battle of Stalingrad (I think it was). Those imortal lines "Give me liberty or give me death." A true statesman! We need more people like that now adays.
vbNeo
Feb 16th, 2003, 02:55 PM
They DID use spades, TRUST me on this 1!
And Britain wasnt involved in the Soviet affair at stalingrad, ONLY russian and german troops. Try watching the movie "Enemy At The Gates" gives you a good view of what really happened!
Cheers
Suzzi
Feb 16th, 2003, 03:00 PM
Originally posted by vbNeo
They DID use spades, TRUST me on this 1!
And Britain wasnt involved in the Soviet affair at stalingrad, ONLY russian and german troops. Try watching the movie "Enemy At The Gates" gives you a good view of what really happened!
Cheers
Are you sure the British weren't invovled in the battle of Stalingrad. I could have sworn they were. Maybe they just sent some warships to help out the Russians.
Anony
Feb 16th, 2003, 03:05 PM
Yeah, it does seem strange that a country (Germany) who are widely regarded as having the most advanced Space Program in the world, would use something as daft as spades, when sticks would quite obviously be a better training tool.
vbNeo
Feb 16th, 2003, 03:09 PM
Originally posted by Suzzi
Are you sure the British weren't invovled in the battle of Stalingrad. I could have sworn they were. Maybe they just sent some warships to help out the Russians.
OH MY BLOODY GOOD, STALINGRAD IS INLAND, THEY CANT SUPPORT WITH SHIPS, AND NO !!! BRITAIN HAD TO SUPPORT THERE OWN FRONTS!!!
Cheers
PS: I'm sorry for getting this angry, it's not your fault, hehe
vbNeo
Feb 16th, 2003, 03:11 PM
Originally posted by Anony
Yeah, it does seem strange that a country (Germany) who are widely regarded as having the most advanced Space Program in the world, would use something as daft as spades, when sticks would quite obviously be a better training tool.
The thing is, theese spades where used for making shooting holes as well, and was part of the main "package" a soldier would have, therefore actually a quite good tool for training.
They also had the back form of a rifle, with should support, which made them better for use than sticks, get it !?
Cheers!
Suzzi
Feb 16th, 2003, 03:14 PM
Originally posted by vbNeo
OH MY BLOODY GOOD, STALINGRAD IS INLAND, THEY CANT SUPPORT WITH SHIPS, AND NO !!! BRITAIN HAD TO SUPPORT THERE OWN FRONTS!!!
Cheers
PS: I'm sorry for getting this angry, it's not your fault, hehe
But if they were Marines, why did they attack an inland city? I'm confused.:confused:
vbNeo
Feb 16th, 2003, 03:16 PM
I dont think you get my point here.
What germany trained was like... a thousand admirals, and by the way, they already had a massive army when wanting to take over stalingrad. they didn't when because of the unexpected winter. If you check the history book, hitler made EXACTLY the same error as napoleon, underestimating the Russian winther.
cheers !
Suzzi
Feb 16th, 2003, 03:24 PM
Originally posted by vbNeo
I dont think you get my point here.
What germany trained was like... a thousand admirals, and by the way, they already had a massive army when wanting to take over stalingrad. they didn't when because of the unexpected winter. If you check the history book, hitler made EXACTLY the same error as napoleon, underestimating the Russian winther.
cheers !
You're right, sorry I am so confused. They sent 1,000 Admirals,... but no boats to the battle of Stalingrad. I'm soooo totally lost. Sorry, could you explain it again.
Suzzi
Feb 16th, 2003, 03:26 PM
Originally posted by vbNeo
they didn't win because of the unexpected winter.
Doesn't it occur at the same time each year? I mean, even I know that winter lasts from October to February. That Hitler guy must have been a right thicky.
vbNeo
Feb 16th, 2003, 03:28 PM
Well, they send a 1000 admirals to polen, thereby getting weapons for other troops, then they invaded some more countries, got more weapons etc. and THEN they attacked Russia, with a gigantic army, get it ?
And yes, hitler knew when winter came, he just thought he would have had russia under control before the winter came, but he didnt, which actally was what saved russia.
Cheers !
Suzzi
Feb 16th, 2003, 03:30 PM
But why 1,000 Admirals??? :confused: Aren't they the old guys in all the gold trim who tell younger officers what to do. I just can't see anyone being frightened of 1,000 old men coming towards them covered in gold braid with starch white uniforms. I mean, the uniforms would get all muddy for one thing.
Skitchen8
Feb 16th, 2003, 03:31 PM
Originally posted by vbNeo
Well, they send a 1000 admirals to polen, thereby getting weapons for other troops, then they invaded some more countries, got more weapons etc. and THEN they attacked Russia, with a gigantic army, get it ?
And yes, hitler knew when winter came, he just thought he would have had russia under control before the winter came, but he didnt, which actally was what saved russia.
Cheers ! stalin had good reason behind signing that agreement with hitler... he knew he'd delay them long enough so that winter would give them more hope
CornedBee
Feb 16th, 2003, 03:32 PM
Well, why did Hitler have Napoleon in his staff then?
vbNeo
Feb 16th, 2003, 03:34 PM
Originally posted by Suzzi
But why 1,000 Admirals??? :confused: Aren't they the old guys in all the gold trim who tell younger officers what to do. I just can't see anyone being frightened of 1,000 old men coming towards them covered in gold braid with starch white uniforms. I mean, the uniforms would get all muddy for one thing.
By admirals i mean VERY GOOD SOLDIERS.
Skitchen8
Feb 16th, 2003, 03:35 PM
his staff wasn't nearly large enough to fit them both, hitler had to extend his staff just to fit him in... :rolleyes: though i heard that he beat a few french people with his staff after visiting nude beaches
vbNeo
Feb 16th, 2003, 03:35 PM
Originally posted by CornedBee
Well, why did Hitler have Napoleon in his staff then?
Napoleon was the dictator of france in the 1600s, he to tried to take world domination...
Cheers!
Skitchen8
Feb 16th, 2003, 03:37 PM
and he was short, and you can buy him now, he includes vanilla strawberry and chocolate ice cream...
vbNeo
Feb 16th, 2003, 03:38 PM
probs the smallest dictator ever to walk the earth ;)
Cheers
vbNeo
Feb 16th, 2003, 03:52 PM
Suzzi, do u even do VB ? hehe
Cheers!
cafeenman
Feb 16th, 2003, 04:10 PM
Originally posted by vbNeo
PEARL HARBOR WASNT BOMBED, ARE ALL YOU PEOPLE ****** !?
THERE ARE TAPES, SOUND RECORDINGS, AND TOMBSTONES, SURVIVORS AND WRECKS, OHHH YES MY FRIENDS, PEARL HARBOR WAS BOMBED, AND IT WAS DONE BY JAPAN!!!
No it wasn't. Pearl Harbor is an urban legend. Hollywood makes a movie and suddenly everyone thinks it's history. :rolleyes:
AND CAFEENMAN, YOU SAY MY STUFF SUCKS, READ AND LEARN SOMETHING!!!
CHEERS(I BLOODY GUESS)
I didn't say your stuff sucks. How would I know what your stuff does?
beachbum
Feb 16th, 2003, 04:23 PM
Originally posted by cafeenman
No it wasn't. Pearl Harbor is an urban legend. Hollywood makes a movie and suddenly everyone thinks it's history. :rolleyes:
Pfffffffffft.. next thing u will be telling me is that U571 was fiction!
My father made a very observant comment the other day. He said that television viewing at this time of year was quite terrible and that a good war would liven things up :) So, all u tv stations out there... heed this advice... war = ratings :) And none of this fake moon landing trickery!
cafeenman
Feb 16th, 2003, 04:28 PM
Originally posted by vbNeo
By admirals i mean VERY GOOD SOLDIERS.
OK, now I'm really confused. First you say that Russia bombed Pearl Harbor (which never happened, btw) to stave off the affections of Germany.
Then you say that Germany sent 1,000 admirals with sticks and shovels to take over Russia.
Next you say that Germany couldn't beat the Russians because winter came in the middle summer. Maybe I'm just a poor tactician, but it seems to me that 1,000 fat guys trying to beat down seven billion russians with sticks isn't a good tactic regardless of the season.
Also, soldiers are in the army and admirals are in the navy. So how do 1,000 admirals = good soldiers? I think you need to rewrite your program. This one keep raising terminal exceptions.
cafeenman
Feb 16th, 2003, 04:30 PM
Originally posted by beachbum
Pfffffffffft.. next thing u will be telling me is that U571 was fiction!
Actually, it's depleted U572.
beachbum
Feb 16th, 2003, 04:36 PM
I bet u are a bloody no good non history knowing american caffenman or whatever ur bloody name is!
For your information Russia wasnt even in WW2. You are getting mixed up with the White and Red russians of WW1. Hitler and Ribbentrop signed a peace pact which kept Russia out of the war. And anyway, Hitler always had a soft spot for the Slavic peoples of the world .. some of the best workers.
Czechoslovakia was terribly rude to their german minority and deserved to lose Sudentenland and as for the Poles... the Germans only wanted their corridor to Danzig back. Granted, they made a 6 lane freeway instead of a donkey track. The Germans are so misunderstood. Interestingly, noone criticised the German invasion of France at the time.
Suzzi
Feb 16th, 2003, 04:43 PM
Originally posted by vbNeo
Napoleon was the dictator of france in the 1600s, he to tried to take world domination...
Cheers!
How could he do that, when America wasn't discovered until the 1800's?
Maybe he strived for European domination?
And yes, I do VB at a night course, but I really want to become a doctor. Luckily History isn't important for doctoring, but I'm a dab hand with a kitchen knife, so I think I'd be well suited for surgery.
Suzzi
Feb 16th, 2003, 04:44 PM
Originally posted by vbNeo
By admirals i mean VERY GOOD SOLDIERS.
Wouldn't he have been better training them as Storm Troopers then, kinda like in Star Wars!
cafeenman
Feb 16th, 2003, 04:45 PM
Originally posted by beachbum
I bet u are a bloody no good non history knowing american caffenman or whatever ur bloody name is!
For your information Russia wasnt even in WW2. You are getting mixed up with the White and Red russians of WW1. Hitler and Ribbentrop signed a peace pact which kept Russia out of the war. And anyway, Hitler always had a soft spot for the Slavic peoples of the world .. some of the best workers.
Czechoslovakia was terribly rude to their german minority and deserved to lose Sudentenland and as for the Poles... the Germans only wanted their corridor to Danzig back. Granted, they made a 6 lane freeway instead of a donkey track. The Germans are so misunderstood. Interestingly, noone criticised the German invasion of France at the time.
Why would anyone criticise? Nobody likes France anyway. French people don't like France and we all know how Belgians feel about the place.
I agree with you that the rest of Asia was rude to Germany and Germany had just cause for conquering it. But as has become widely known, Germany was only in it for the water beneath the surface. Other than that, they didn't really care.
If you've ever been to Germany, you'd want to conquer someplace else too. The weather there sucks.
mendhak
Feb 16th, 2003, 04:50 PM
LOL! I'm surprised at the number of people who actually believe that Pearl Harbor was a real event in history.
Man... *wipes tears*
wow... thanks for the laughs. :)
cafeenman
Feb 16th, 2003, 04:53 PM
Originally posted by mendhak
LOL! I'm surprised at the number of people who actually believe that Pearl Harbor was a real event in history.
Man... *wipes tears*
wow... thanks for the laughs. :)
Next thing you know, everyone will believe an oil crew went into space and blew up an asteroid. Or even better, that America actually landed troops in Normandy during WWII.
No War!
Feb 16th, 2003, 04:53 PM
Originally posted by cafeenman
If you've ever been to Germany, you'd want to conquer someplace else too. The weather there sucks.
Amen! DeCaf man! :)
Suzzi
Feb 16th, 2003, 04:55 PM
Wow! I always thought that Pearl Harbour really happened!
Thats what they taught us in school! Are you guys seriously suggesting that it didn't (P.S. I knew they never landed troops at Normandy though - We weren't even in the war at that point).
mendhak
Feb 16th, 2003, 04:58 PM
Originally posted by Suzzi
Wow! I always thought that Pearl Harbour really happened!
Thats what they taught us in school! Are you guys seriously suggesting that it didn't (P.S. I knew they never landed troops at Normandy though - We weren't even in the war at that point).
No, Pearl Harbor never happened. It was actually another one of those "modern artwork" exhibitions created by a wealthy artist, whose name I forgot.
His work was so convincing, that an urban legend was created by it... that the Japs bombed it, so on and so forth...
Caf may know better.
Suzzi
Feb 16th, 2003, 05:03 PM
Wow! Thanks! I've been meaning to go visit Pearl Harbour, but it's such a long trip to Florida that I never got around to it. I would have looked really silly trying to find wrecked warships or whatever. Phew! Glad I didn't do that.
I always thought it was a bit strange that the enemy bombed a harbour. I mean, it's not like it's going to sink or any such thing? This all makes a lot more sense now.
Thanks.
Jamie-Lee
Feb 16th, 2003, 05:11 PM
Originally posted by mendhak
LOL! I'm surprised at the number of people who actually believe that Pearl Harbor was a real event in history.
Man... *wipes tears*
wow... thanks for the laughs. :)
But the internet said that it did happen, so it must be true
Suzzi
Feb 16th, 2003, 05:21 PM
Originally posted by Jamie-Lee
But the internet said that it did happen, so it must be true
Yeah, I always wonder what to believe and what not.
That vbNeo guy had me going for a bit believeing that the Germans trained with Spades, but I think I've seen through that ruse.
No War!
Feb 16th, 2003, 05:22 PM
Originally posted by Jamie-Lee
But the internet said that it did happen, so it must be true
Well, there are also people on the internet saying Bush is NOT a dickhead, so there goes it's credibility.
cafeenman
Feb 16th, 2003, 05:35 PM
Suzzi, Mendhak, vbNeo - I was in the Army (U.S.) for almost two years before I got kicked out in 2001 for really unfair reasons. Therefore I'm an authority on subjects such as this.
First, Pearl Harbor was a staging point in WWII for Australia (who were our allies for a while) on their island hopping campaign to defeat Vietnam and I think Japan or China.
Second, Pearl Harbor is not in Florida. If you look on any map you can plainly see that it is just south of Alaska and California. It always amazes me that they say Alaska is so cold and Hawaii is tropical when they seem so close to each other.
Florida was not bombed by Germany until near the end of the war in total desperation.
Adolph Hitler was an Australian who was ousted from various private schools as a child for misbehavior. His family emmigrated to Germany in the late 1890's carrying everything they owned in a horse-drawn wagon. That was great for him, because his behavior was on par with the rest of Germany's kids, so he fit right in.
He made several close friends while attending medical school in Stuttgart (Rommel, Heimlich, Marshall Tito to name a few). Because of UN sanctions, Germany always had a water shortage which is why they decided to conquer Asia, starting with France.
I hope this clears it all up.
PS. Russia was on Germany's side until Germany wouldn't show them how to build cool tanks. So when Germany decided to invade Russia, the Russians nearest the eastern front packed everything up and moved to Pearl Harbor and thus Germany's supply lines were stretched to the point where they could no longer support their admirals. However, some German sympathisers did live near Pearl and often performed night ops to include some minor bombings and such.
What it all boiled down to was hollywood had a choice between trying to recreate blowing up entire forests with tanks and mortars (expensive) or blowing up a chow hall with a few sticks of dynamite. They compromised and made up a story about the Vietnamese bombing Pearl Harbor in AT-6 Texans.
Jamie-Lee
Feb 16th, 2003, 05:36 PM
I am so confused. Why did the Americans join the war then? I always wondered why they went to France, when it was Japan who bombed them
cafeenman
Feb 16th, 2003, 05:40 PM
Originally posted by No War!
Well, there are also people on the internet saying Bush is NOT a dickhead, so there goes it's credibility.
Bush isn't a dickhead! Here's proof! (http://www.paulkjohnson.com/bush_is_not_a_dickhead.htm)
cafeenman
Feb 16th, 2003, 05:45 PM
Originally posted by Jamie-Lee
I am so confused. Why did the Americans join the war then? I always wondered why they went to France, when it was Japan who bombed them
Think about it. Our ally (Australia, remember?) creates a monster and then acts cavalier about it - they even started gloating. It was pissing everyone off. So when they torpedoed the titanic, that was all the excuse we needed. I'll bet you didn't know that only about 20% of all australian sub crews survived the war. That's because they pissed of Yamoto and McArthy so they were getting it from both sides.
Jamie-Lee
Feb 16th, 2003, 05:55 PM
Originally posted by cafeenman
Think about it. Our ally (Australia, remember?) creates a monster and then acts cavalier about it - they even started gloating. It was pissing everyone off. So when they torpedoed the titanic, that was all the excuse we needed. I'll bet you didn't know that only about 20% of all australian sub crews survived the war. That's because they pissed of Yamoto and McArthy so they were getting it from both sides.
Australia torpedoed the Titanic? :mad: Why didn't we go to war against them???
beachbum
Feb 16th, 2003, 05:56 PM
Originally posted by cafeenman
Bush isn't a dickhead! Here's proof! (http://www.paulkjohnson.com/bush_is_not_a_dickhead.htm)
Are u available for hire as a website designer?
We all seem to be missing one important point here-> .
cafeenman
Feb 16th, 2003, 05:58 PM
Originally posted by Jamie-Lee
Australia torpedoed the Titanic? :mad: Why didn't we go to war against them???
We did! That was why we were actually having two wars at the same time. That's why it was called WWII.
In the pacific, we were at war with Vietnam. In the Atlantic, we were at war with Australia. In the mean time, Russia was stomping all over Germany and the French were cowering as they always do.
beachbum
Feb 16th, 2003, 05:59 PM
I thought it was the sinking of Lithuania that got americans pissed off at Germany... didnt they lose heaps of 'alleged' civilians on that?
cafeenman
Feb 16th, 2003, 06:00 PM
Originally posted by beachbum
Are u available for hire as a website designer?
We all seem to be missing one important point here-> .
If you'd like a similar page for your site, I can do it at a reasonable cost. Generally it takes me only a day or so to develop a page like that. Of course if you want extras such as keywords and tags and stuff, that will cost more.
cafeenman
Feb 16th, 2003, 06:02 PM
Originally posted by beachbum
I thought it was the sinking of Lithuania that got americans pissed off at Germany... didnt they lose heaps of 'alleged' civilians on that?
I think you're right. Sorry, I get all those blimps confused. Actually, it wasn't the Titanic at all. It was the Graph Hindenbig that we sunk (which was an accident, btw).
beachbum
Feb 16th, 2003, 06:03 PM
Oh the humanity!
Alien_poo
Feb 16th, 2003, 09:50 PM
All of this is very funny
Anony
Feb 17th, 2003, 03:53 AM
Well I've done some reasearch and read a few books about WWII and it seems the commonly held opinion is that the US staged Pearl habour in response to the Japanese testing their first nuclear bomb at nagasaki and when it went wrong and killed 100's of people they decided to accuse the US of dropping it on them. The US then blew up a few empty warships belonging to Hawai and blamed it on the Japanese.
Of course the Hawain people realised who had really done it but when the US invaded them and made them part of the federation it was too late for them.
No War!
Feb 17th, 2003, 03:55 AM
Originally posted by cafeenman
Bush isn't a dickhead! Here's proof! (http://www.paulkjohnson.com/bush_is_not_a_dickhead.htm)
That's exactly what I'm saying! Dubya is a dickhead, there's no doubt about that. So if you say on the internet that he isn't, then there is no way I can trust anything on the internet again!
vbNeo
Feb 17th, 2003, 12:26 PM
cafeenman, youre mixing everything i said up! but anyways, i do NOT think pearl harbor was some fandy trick. The first moon landing MAYBE, but NOT pearl harbor, it's like saying no jues(sorry for bad spelling) were killed during WW2, that holocaust didn't exist(which is probably what you are going to tell me now, isn't it ?). And yes, WE DID have troops in normandy, D-Day was a reality. And bu the way, WW2 really existed, even though you might think it's all a big trick
vbNeo
Feb 17th, 2003, 12:29 PM
Originally posted by cafeenman
If you'd like a similar page for your site, I can do it at a reasonable cost. Generally it takes me only a day or so to develop a page like that. Of course if you want extras such as keywords and tags and stuff, that will cost more.
Hehe, no bugging dude, but your site isn't... THAT nice :-).
Maybe a little HTML design practising was a topic ? hehe. J/K
(No wonder it only takes a day to build, i could do it in an hour or 2 ;))
Cheers
Anony
Feb 17th, 2003, 12:33 PM
The landing on the moon was a hoax. You saw the flag flapping in the empty space and Louis Armstrong said it was a giant leap for mankind. You can't flap a flag in space, nor can sound travel in space. So it was all a setup.
We never said WW2 was a trick. You can't have billions of people blowing each other up and deny it ever happened. Besides, most of us aren't speaking German which means we won on aggregation.
Still, those Germans were wicked with their shovels.
vbNeo
Feb 17th, 2003, 12:35 PM
PaulCO is my fictitious company that manufactures Pauls - a human male alternative. You can choose your favorite model from stock or have him custom designed to your specifications. Visit your local PaulCO Paul dealership to pick up a new Paul and some great PaulCO accessories today!
Had a great laugh visiting that site, thanks :-).
(Nice image manipulation)
Skitchen8
Feb 17th, 2003, 12:36 PM
uhhh... sound can travel through space, besides the fact any astronaut would have been inside a pressurized helmet, so uhh... yeah...
Suzzi
Feb 17th, 2003, 12:40 PM
I'm not sure what I believe now. Most of World War II seems to have happened, the moon landings might or might not have happened. It's all so confusing.
But all of this detracts from the main point. We have proof that Iraq (and ther leader... Colnel Ghaddaffi) is sponsoring terrorism and build weapons of mass destruction.
I think it's only fair that we attack them now, before this degenerates into another fiasco like the first Gulf War.
Anony
Feb 17th, 2003, 12:42 PM
Originally posted by Skitchen8
uhhh... sound can travel through space, besides the fact any astronaut would have been inside a pressurized helmet, so uhh... yeah...
I thought sounds was contractions and expansions of air and space had no air, at least no breathable air. So how would the sound reach earth ?
vbNeo
Feb 17th, 2003, 12:52 PM
Sound can travel through space, but not as you normally know it. It can travel through radiowaves, which(i can't remember how) is able to travel througj zippo(They might travel as particels), As light does.
Now we could ask the question, is light WaVeS, or is it parTIkels ?
Just bwabbling.
Cheers!
vbNeo
Feb 17th, 2003, 12:53 PM
Originally posted by Suzzi
I'm not sure what I believe now. Most of World War II seems to have happened, the moon landings might or might not have happened. It's all so confusing.
But all of this detracts from the main point. We have proof that Iraq (and ther leader... Colnel Ghaddaffi) is sponsoring terrorism and build weapons of mass destruction.
I think it's only fair that we attack them now, before this degenerates into another fiasco like the first Gulf War.
I agree with you, to one point. We need to make sure to have food and supplies for the people of iraq, we do not wan't another afghanistan now do we ?
Cheers!
Anony
Feb 17th, 2003, 12:54 PM
Afghanis can listen to the radio thanks to us !
vbNeo
Feb 17th, 2003, 01:18 PM
WAHT THE HELL would you do with a radio when you need food and shelter for your ever starving family ?
It's like giving a little afghan a dollar, what the hey is he supposed to do with it ? make a fire ?
Cheers
Anony
Feb 17th, 2003, 01:42 PM
That's their freedom, isn't it ? No more itchy beards, no more sherpas to wear and no more illiteracy. They can go to school and learn about democracy.
No War!
Feb 17th, 2003, 02:33 PM
Originally posted by Suzzi
I'm not sure what I believe now. Most of World War II seems to have happened, the moon landings might or might not have happened. It's all so confusing.
But all of this detracts from the main point. We have proof that Iraq (and ther leader... Colnel Ghaddaffi) is sponsoring terrorism and build weapons of mass destruction.
I think it's only fair that we attack them now, before this degenerates into another fiasco like the first Gulf War.
You fecking militaristic murderer! Do you really want to kill millions of innocent iraqi's? This is just sad!
Jamie-Lee
Feb 17th, 2003, 02:55 PM
The terrorists are fed Saddam's fodder each day and he has turned them against the West. If you only eliminate Saddam it will make him look like a martyr. Sometimes you have to be cruel to be kind and get rid of others too. Saddam kills his own people, he must be removed.
No War!
Feb 17th, 2003, 03:40 PM
That's rubbish! Saddam has no link to the Al-Qaida terrorists. To bin Laden, and most Muslims, Saddam is an apostate, an unfaithfull one.
Suzzi
Feb 17th, 2003, 03:59 PM
Originally posted by No War!
You fecking militaristic murderer! Do you really want to kill millions of innocent iraqi's? This is just sad!
We've learnt from history what will happen if we leave Iraq alone.
We ignored Iraq for decades, and look what happened,... the Crusades, the Boer War, Word War I, World War II..... how many more lives need to be lost to this sensless slaughter before we do something about it?
Iraq has been causing trouble for centuries.. and we just take it.
Fair enough, they have given us some usefull things (like the number 0), but I'm sure, given enough time we would have invented our own number zero, and it would probably have been better than there's.
Anony
Feb 17th, 2003, 04:11 PM
Originally posted by No War!
That's rubbish! Saddam has no link to the Al-Qaida terrorists. To bin Laden, and most Muslims, Saddam is an apostate, an unfaithfull one.
He's certainly not an apostle. Where did you get a ridiculous idea like that ?
Perhaps he's a sherbet, you never know but certainly no apostle. Besided Bing Lager isn't his friend, he said it in an interview with the Times. He is going to encourage Jihad all over the world if the US bomb Iraq. I think he's one bomb away from being novelty cave decoration. He may have survived the Afghanistan war by bombimg Pekingov to smithereens but he's no match for our smart bombs. Just you wait another year or two and they will have found him !
No War!
Feb 17th, 2003, 04:15 PM
Originally posted by Anony
He's certainly not an apostle. Where did you get a ridiculous idea like that ?
I checked it with some Muslim acquintences.
He has done almost everything Allah forbids.
Anony
Feb 17th, 2003, 04:17 PM
Doesn't make him an apostle. Kids fiddlers rarely get in high positions in Christianity or any other religion.
No War!
Feb 17th, 2003, 04:19 PM
Well, if you don't believe ask Ayatullah Khomenei and Ayatullah Khamenei.
Anony
Feb 17th, 2003, 04:21 PM
Those are not real people !
No War!
Feb 17th, 2003, 04:31 PM
I know. One of them is dead, I just don't know which one....
Suzzi
Feb 17th, 2003, 04:33 PM
I think Ayatullah Khomenei was originally a US citizen before he converted to Islam. His real name was George Diefenbacher or some such, apparently he studied at Harvard. Not a lot of people know that.
No War!
Feb 17th, 2003, 04:35 PM
Yes, I've heard that too. It is said he went to the catholic church before being converted.
cafeenman
Feb 17th, 2003, 05:22 PM
Originally posted by vbNeo
cafeenman, youre mixing everything i said up! but anyways, i do NOT think pearl harbor was some fandy trick. The first moon landing MAYBE, but NOT pearl harbor, it's like saying no jues(sorry for bad spelling) were killed during WW2, that holocaust didn't exist(which is probably what you are going to tell me now, isn't it ?). And yes, WE DID have troops in normandy, D-Day was a reality. And bu the way, WW2 really existed, even though you might think it's all a big trick
See this is the problem with all you Deutchland people. You watch way too much tv and movies. Yes, the moon landings did take place. If they had been a hoax, we never would have had the technology to fight WWII at all!
I know the holocaust happened as well. It was "The" holocaust that they based the Wizard of Oz on. In fact, that was footage of the real holocaust that they showed taking away Dorothy's house. But that has nothing to do with your fantasies. At least I hope it doesn't.
And what do you mean "WE had troops in Normandy?" You're not even American. If you had troops there how does that disprove that there were no American troops there.
Again, I'm a war scholar and know what I'm talking about. We covered WWII for almost two hours one day in my basic combat training, so I feel I'm much better qualified than you to quote the "facts."
PS. I'd like to see you try and create a page like mine in only an hour. :)
cafeenman
Feb 17th, 2003, 05:23 PM
Originally posted by Alien_poo
All of this is very funny
Slaughtering millions of people always is. :cool:
rjlohan
Feb 17th, 2003, 05:39 PM
Originally posted by vbNeo
WAHT THE HELL would you do with a radio when you need food and shelter for your ever starving family ?
It's like giving a little afghan a dollar, what the hey is he supposed to do with it ? make a fire ?
Cheers
You could call the French. Then they could bring some white flags to repel the invading Turks. :mad:
Suzzi
Feb 17th, 2003, 05:41 PM
Originally posted by vbNeo
WAHT THE HELL would you do with a radio when you need food and shelter for your ever starving family ?
It's like giving a little afghan a dollar, what the hey is he supposed to do with it ? make a fire ?
Cheers
They could supersize their coke and fries!
Saddam Hussain
Feb 17th, 2003, 05:44 PM
Don't bomb at me. I are a nice guy. really. I love supersize french fries and big macs
rjlohan
Feb 17th, 2003, 05:44 PM
Yeah great Suzzi - just what Iraq needs - more American imperialism infesting their country by way of sugar-water, specifically coloured to conceal US-engineered carcinogens... :rolleyes:
cafeenman
Feb 17th, 2003, 05:45 PM
Originally posted by Suzzi
We've learnt from history what will happen if we leave Iraq alone.
Exactly, Suzzi. The best example in recent times is when Iraq took over the Canadian embassy and held all those U.S. foreign exchange students hostage until we had to send Reagan over to get them. I don't know why we don't dress ALL of our soldiers like cowboys, since Iraqi's always surrender to them without a fight.
cafeenman
Feb 17th, 2003, 05:47 PM
Originally posted by rjlohan
specifically coloured to conceal US-engineered carcinogens... :rolleyes:
What's wrong with that? Do you want them to be visible???
Saddam Hussain
Feb 17th, 2003, 05:57 PM
Originally posted by No War!
That's rubbish! Saddam has no link to the Al-Qaida terrorists. To bin Laden, and most Muslims, Saddam is an apostate, an unfaithfull one.
Let me clear up that rumpor. There is nothing wrong with my apostrate. I have a docotr and he says ther is little or no chance of me having apostate cancer. As ling as I keep taking my flintstones vitamins that I get through my oil for food programs I will be ok.
PS: Bin laden is a ******. He got drunk at one of my palace parties and mistook my clothes hamper as the toilet. I haven't let him back since. He's a very bad drunk.
Saddam Hussain
Feb 17th, 2003, 06:00 PM
Originally posted by cafeenman
Exactly, Suzzi. The best example in recent times is when Iraq took over the Canadian embassy and held all those U.S. foreign exchange students hostage until we had to send Reagan over to get them. I don't know why we don't dress ALL of our soldiers like cowboys, since Iraqi's always surrender to them without a fight.
I wasn't holding them hostage, we were playing drinking games and doing beer bongs of molsen and l'batts blue. REgan cam in and made every one drive home drunk.
rjlohan
Feb 17th, 2003, 06:01 PM
Typical US government policy. Hide your own chemical weapons and attack Arabs for not hiding weapons. :mad:
And I suppose you think you invented 'french fries' too. :rolleyes:
Suzzi
Feb 17th, 2003, 06:08 PM
Originally posted by rjlohan
And I suppose you think you invented 'french fries' too. :rolleyes:
We did so!
I can't beleive you are trying to disparage our finest gift to the culinary world (with the exception of good old american Pizza)
cafeenman
Feb 17th, 2003, 06:09 PM
Originally posted by rjlohan
And I suppose you think you invented 'french fries' too. :rolleyes:
If it makes you feel better to blame the French for them, by all means do so. I think, however, that they would turn around and blame us.
Suzzi
Feb 17th, 2003, 06:12 PM
It's okay. I have a freind who works for the government, and he assures me that Frances days are numbered. Come the next election, we'll be nuking their sorry asses back to Rome.
Jamie-Lee
Feb 17th, 2003, 06:12 PM
Can't we just blame Canada? They're French too
Saddam Hussain
Feb 17th, 2003, 06:13 PM
I like french toast.
Suzzi
Feb 17th, 2003, 06:15 PM
Originally posted by Jamie-Lee
Can't we just blame Canada? They're French too
I thought we already had. Didn't 5 of the 20 WTC terrorists come into the country via Canada? So obviously the Cannucks are in league with Osama Bin Liner anyway.
Why else would they be so hesitant about join in an attack on Iraq. They're obviously sympathisers.
And don't forget the War of 1812. They owe us a capitol city!
cafeenman
Feb 17th, 2003, 06:15 PM
Originally posted by Jamie-Lee
Can't we just blame Canada? They're French too
Then in all fairness we'd have to nuke New Orleans too. But I guess we don't have to be fair because we are Americans after all. :)
Jamie-Lee
Feb 17th, 2003, 06:16 PM
Originally posted by Suzzi
I thought we already had. Didn't 5 of the 20 WTC terrorists come into the country via Canada? So obviously the Cannucks are in league with Osama Bin Liner anyway.
Why else would they be so hesitant about join in an attack on Iraq. They're obviously sympathisers.
And don't forget the War of 1812. They owe us a capitol city!
So true
I've figured it all out. Canada is France. The French hate the English. So therefore because the English are trying to become the 51st state, Canada is jealous, and is plotting with Iraq!
cafeenman
Feb 17th, 2003, 06:20 PM
Originally posted by Saddam Hussain
I like french toast.
I've heard it's a favorite among despots. :rolleyes:
I don't even know what you're doing here. Can you even write VB code or is the only thing you're good at is burning oil wells and releasing chemical weapons on your own citizens? I don't think Bush should invade your country, but you are obviously a scumbag and the sooner you're gone, the better.
Why don't you do everyone a favor and just take your money and retire to someplace like Denmark or Austria and go on kangaroo rides or something. You've worked hard. It's time for you to start enjoying your golden years. Think about it? Would you rather be dodging sniper bullets or playing canasta with your friends?
Saddam Hussain
Feb 17th, 2003, 06:22 PM
Originally posted by Suzzi
Why else would they be so hesitant about join in an attack on Iraq. They're obviously sympathisers.
I like Canada. They make one helluva french toast!
cafeenman
Feb 17th, 2003, 06:23 PM
Originally posted by vbNeo
Had a great laugh visiting that site, thanks :-).
(Nice image manipulation)
From what you said, I thought someone hacked my site and messed with the images. What are you talking about with manipulation? The images are fine. :confused:
Saddam Hussain
Feb 17th, 2003, 06:25 PM
Originally posted by cafeenman
I've heard it's a favorite among despots. :rolleyes:
I don't even know what you're doing here. Can you even write VB code or is the only thing you're good at is burning oil wells and releasing chemical weapons on your own citizens? I don't think Bush should invade your country, but you are obviously a scumbag and the sooner you're gone, the better.
Why don't you do everyone a favor and just take your money and retire to someplace like Denmark or Austria and go on kangaroo rides or something. You've worked hard. It's time for you to start enjoying your golden years. Think about it? Would you rather be dodging sniper bullets or playing canasta with your friends?
I'm not allowed to have kangaroos. Aparently the make on heck of an explosion if you split their atoms. I'm not even allowed to have McDonalds french fries. Apparently they found out that fast food kills thousands of Americans every year. It falls under WMD or something.
Jamie-Lee
Feb 17th, 2003, 06:25 PM
Originally posted by Saddam Hussain
I like Canada. They make one helluva french toast!
I don't know how you can have the audacity to post as you do :mad: You make me sick :mad: Still, what goes around comes around!
Saddam Hussain
Feb 17th, 2003, 06:27 PM
I am thinking I will be unemployed in a few months so I want to learn VB so I have something to fall back on. Gotta keep my options open you know:D
rjlohan
Feb 17th, 2003, 06:41 PM
Hey Saddam, maybe you could use your skills as a crazed murderer, and go work for the Bush administration? They need a man who can at least speak some English, so they have someone to deliver their speeches more effectively.
Saddam Hussain
Feb 17th, 2003, 06:44 PM
msnbc
“AT 11:55 A.M., a U-2 surveillance plane entered Iraqi airspace and reconnoitered several areas of Iraq and left Iraqi airspace at 4:15 p.m.,” the Iraqi Foreign Ministry said in a statement. “The reconnaissance operation lasted four hours and 20 minutes.”
YIPPIE! I love U2, that Bono guy is one righteous dude. I hope they come back soon so I can get an autograph. Oh, BTW can someone please tell me what "reconnoitered" means? I have a bet with Haziz and mushariff down here in the bunker that it is something they do to camels on those adult web sites on the internet. I think he is pulling my leg though. YEAAAA U2 ROCKS.
cafeenman
Feb 17th, 2003, 06:47 PM
Originally posted by rjlohan
Hey Saddam, maybe you could use your skills as a crazed murderer, and go work for the Bush administration? They need a man who can at least speak some English, so they have someone to deliver their speeches more effectively. It's comments like these that make you Jordanians look so stupid to everyone else.
Saddam Hussain
Feb 17th, 2003, 06:47 PM
Originally posted by rjlohan
Hey Saddam, maybe you could use your skills as a crazed murderer, and go work for the Bush administration? They need a man who can at least speak some English, so they have someone to deliver their speeches more effectively.
I heard OJ Simpson was looking for a new Limo driver. I sent in a resume. If I don't get that job mabe I try out as speech writer. I very good at motivating people.
Saddam Hussain
Feb 17th, 2003, 06:49 PM
Originally posted by cafeenman
It's comments like these that make you Jordanians look so stupid to everyone else.
HEY! be nice, I bet you couldn't play basketball that well when you are 40 years old.:mad:
cafeenman
Feb 17th, 2003, 06:49 PM
Originally posted by Saddam Hussain
YIPPIE! I love U2, that Bono guy is one righteous dude. I hope they come back soon so I can get an autograph. Oh, BTW can someone please tell me what "reconnoitered" means? I have a bet with Haziz and mushariff down here in the bunker that it is something they do to camels on those adult web sites on the internet. I think he is pulling my leg though. YEAAAA U2 ROCKS.
I can spot a bull-****ter from a mile away. I'm almost positive you aren't really Saddam at all. The only way you can prove to me that you are indeed Saddam is to tell me exactly where you are at this very moment.
Saddam Hussain
Feb 17th, 2003, 06:51 PM
I am on the crapper right now. All of these bunker rations I've been eating latley can really clog up your pipes, if you know what I mean!
cafeenman
Feb 17th, 2003, 06:55 PM
Originally posted by Saddam Hussain
I am on the crapper right now. All of these bunker rations I've been eating latley can really clog up your pipes, if you know what I mean!
I knew you were full of ****! Give me GPS coordinates to prove you are who you say you are.
Saddam Hussain
Feb 17th, 2003, 06:58 PM
I am no longer full of **** thank you. however, I am out of toilet paper. pardon me while I try to steal habib's turban. He is sleeping so hopefully he dosn't notice this time.
siyan
Feb 17th, 2003, 07:01 PM
Originally posted by Suzzi
Well, they could easily sell these to Canada, Mexico or Madagasca
Is paranoia a way of life for you?
And Madagascar is a bit more than 150miles from the US.
cafeenman
Feb 17th, 2003, 07:09 PM
Originally posted by siyan
Is paranoia a way of life for you?
And Madagascar is a bit more than 150miles from the US.
You foreigners must get lousy educations. Seriously. Bill Elliot, Al Unser and all those other great drivers come from Madagascar which is right in the heart of Kentucky. So asking how far it is from the U.S. is a trick question.
PS. Your commentary on this situation has been great Suzzi. Don't worry about your detractors. They're obviously ignorant of many things.
Suzzi
Feb 17th, 2003, 07:38 PM
Originally posted by siyan
Is paranoia a way of life for you?
And Madagascar is a bit more than 150miles from the US.
Obviously you've never heard of the American-Madagscar tunnel (it runs under Africa and the Atlantic). Suddenly you're not so smart as you think you are eh? So called Mr. Smarty pants.
rjlohan
Feb 17th, 2003, 09:10 PM
Originally posted by siyan
Is paranoia a way of life for you?
And Madagascar is a bit more than 150miles from the US.
What's paranoid about it? Where do you think Saddam got his nervous gases from? And where did the Assyrians get their tomahawk missiles? Hmmmm...?
cafeenman
Feb 17th, 2003, 09:27 PM
Originally posted by rjlohan
What's paranoid about it? Where do you think Saddam got his nervous gases from? And where did the Assyrians get their tomahawk missiles? Hmmmm...?
Stress can give a person gastinal-intestinal discomfort. The fact that he's about to get bombed to about 10 years back from where he is now probably explains his nervous gases.
Some of his troops found the tomahawk missiles in the desert. Nobody knows how they got there. The general concensus is that the Australian SAS were carrying them and couldn't handle the weight, so they left them behind and asked U.S. Special Forces to come and get them.
rjlohan
Feb 17th, 2003, 09:58 PM
Pfffft.... the US Special Forces comprise 20% women, and 80% pussies. :mad:
Every one of the SEALS would lose a fight to any member of the French Women's Hockey team... :rolleyes:
cafeenman
Feb 17th, 2003, 10:43 PM
Originally posted by rjlohan
Pfffft.... the US Special Forces comprise 20% women, and 80% pussies. :mad:
Every one of the SEALS would lose a fight to any member of the French Women's Hockey team... :rolleyes:
I see your point. That's only marginally better than the 100% panty-waste SAS.
PS. Have you ever SMELLED the French Women's Hockey Team??? If not, all I can tell you is that if you're still standing after five seconds, then you have titanium balls.
mikeycorn
Feb 18th, 2003, 01:36 AM
I don't understand why there are people supporting ware anyway.
In every *****ing war, innocent people get killed.
So people who support war, support murdering.
So in essence, they are murderers themself.
No-one would want to admit he/she is a murderer, right?
Maybe if we had just handed Hitler a rose and told him that God loves him then we could've avoided WWII all together and he would have seen the light and stopped killing all those Jews.
When you make a statement like "people who support war, support murdering" you are looking at the world with a 5 year old's mentality. There are evil people out there who would trample the freedoms of people the world over and never give a second thought to slaughtering millions along the way. There is only one language these would-be Hitlers understand and there's only one way that these people can be dealt with.
(Perhaps you need a hint on this one: you don't take care of the Saddams of the world by handing them a rose and hoping they'll see the light and you definately don't do the world any good if you ignore them and leave these madmen to their own devices.)
mikeycorn
Feb 18th, 2003, 02:12 AM
God, what am I doing here, I'm getting sucked into responding to these posts and taking these people at face value.
Suzzi, anony, No War! and Saddam "Hussain" are all new members as of today and they're all (or is it one person) goofing with every post.
I think it's all pretty lame, but I must admit, even though he can't spell his own name, that Saddam imposter had me laughing pretty hard there for a bit.
vbNeo
Feb 18th, 2003, 02:54 AM
Originally posted by cafeenman
See this is the problem with all you Deutchland people. You watch way too much tv and movies. Yes, the moon landings did take place. If they had been a hoax, we never would have had the technology to fight WWII at all!
I know the holocaust happened as well. It was "The" holocaust that they based the Wizard of Oz on. In fact, that was footage of the real holocaust that they showed taking away Dorothy's house. But that has nothing to do with your fantasies. At least I hope it doesn't.
And what do you mean "WE had troops in Normandy?" You're not even American. If you had troops there how does that disprove that there were no American troops there.
Again, I'm a war scholar and know what I'm talking about. We covered WWII for almost two hours one day in my basic combat training, so I feel I'm much better qualified than you to quote the "facts."
PS. I'd like to see you try and create a page like mine in only an hour. :)
Well, you see if been studying WW2 for a long time, therefor i feel quite qualified, and that sometimes make me ignore others arguments. I'm sorry! What do you mean by the first moon landing HAD to have happened ? Wasn't the first rocket BASED on stuff from the V2 ? It was the same scientist :-). By the way,i'm danish, furthermore i hate war movies(they're always inaccurate, like pearl harbor the movie, it sucked, bigtime!). The only TV i see(besides comedy series like frasier, wall and grace etc.) is Discovery Channel <-- is all they show me also Hoax ?
Cheers!
vbNeo
Feb 18th, 2003, 02:57 AM
And what do you mean "WE had troops in Normandy?" You're not even American. If you had troops there how does that disprove that there were no American troops there.
By we i mean the united allies, all the western countries. England, USA and Canada was the ones to take on normandy(with some help from the french resistance :cool: )
Cheers!
vbNeo
Feb 18th, 2003, 02:59 AM
PS. I'd like to see you try and create a page like mine in only an hour.
An hour OR TWO, hehe :-). But naa, i can do it, it's pretty nice, but it ain't that hard!(herby NOT SAYING my old site is better or harder to make!).
I can easily make the design in and hour, it's the contests that's the problems, see, i don't know anything about model aircrafts :eek:
Cheers!
vbNeo
Feb 18th, 2003, 03:01 AM
Originally posted by cafeenman
Stress can give a person gastinal-intestinal discomfort. The fact that he's about to get bombed to about 10 years back from where he is now probably explains his nervous gases.
Some of his troops found the tomahawk missiles in the desert. Nobody knows how they got there. The general concensus is that the Australian SAS were carrying them and couldn't handle the weight, so they left them behind and asked U.S. Special Forces to come and get them.
:D
Gary.Lowe
Feb 18th, 2003, 04:23 AM
I'm sure Britian was invaded too :confused:
My grand father was King George's chaufuer at the time in Torquay when they were on holiday.
sql_lall
Feb 18th, 2003, 04:26 AM
I'm not sure if posting here lowers my status in the Social Heirachy of the VBforums, but here goes.
1) The very first post suggested (probably jokingly) that everything except pizza cutters should be taken from the Iraqis.
Using the same reasoning ("cos they can sell them to people near US") you could say that everyon EXCEPT the US would have to have only pizza cutters.
This would not only mean extra trade for pizza-cutter makers (nothing wrong with that), but it would also leave ALL the world's weapons under the control of George Bush :eek: :eek: :eek: (*Shudders*)
2) I guess it would be a good time to live in Switzerland. Neutral country, AND (soon to be) holders of America's cup, even thought they are LANDLOCKED :):):)
Anony
Feb 18th, 2003, 04:30 AM
They hijacked those plains with these pizza cutters !
Besides, the Swiss are not safe between their mountains. Weren't they once invaded by Hannibal ?
SaddamHussein
Feb 18th, 2003, 04:42 AM
Originally posted by Saddam Hussain
YIPPIE! I love U2, that Bono guy is one righteous dude. I hope they come back soon so I can get an autograph. Oh, BTW can someone please tell me what "reconnoitered" means? I have a bet with Haziz and mushariff down here in the bunker that it is something they do to camels on those adult web sites on the internet. I think he is pulling my leg though. YEAAAA U2 ROCKS.
Methinks you are an imposter - I demand you stop using my (incorrectly spelt) name or I will stamp my feet.
cafeenman
Feb 18th, 2003, 05:55 PM
Originally posted by vbNeo
Well, you see if been studying WW2 for a long time, therefor i feel quite qualified, and that sometimes make me ignore others arguments. I'm sorry! What do you mean by the first moon landing HAD to have happened ? Wasn't the first rocket BASED on stuff from the V2 ? It was the same scientist :-).
Cheers!
I mean what I said. If we hadn't landed on the moon prior to WWII, then we would not have had the technology to knock out the Australian SCUD missiles directed at our west coast. There are too many examples of these type of things to list them all. But had it not been for the space program, we would have had to fight WWII with prop driven aircraft, tanks and infantry soldiers. There is no way we could have won!
PS. I don't know how watching lions mate on the discovery channel makes you a WWII expert, but have it your way.
rjlohan
Feb 18th, 2003, 07:03 PM
Cafeenman is right. It was the Challenger disaster which indirectly led to a cut in defence spending, and thus caused the US to be in a much weaker position in the Vietnam war too. Ironic, that the death of a school teacher could have such dramatic consequences for the outcome of extended military combat. :(
cafeenman
Feb 18th, 2003, 07:53 PM
Originally posted by rjlohan
Cafeenman is right. It was the Challenger disaster which indirectly led to a cut in defence spending, and thus caused the US to be in a much weaker position in the Vietnam war too. Ironic, that the death of a school teacher could have such dramatic consequences for the outcome of extended military combat. :(
It's nice to see someone else here besides me, Suzzi and Anony who knows a little history. :)
PS. Sorry about that SAS comment. You Austrians are OK with me. That NeoGeo guy who doesn't have a clue was getting on my nerves so I was kind of snippy at you. Sorry. :(
cafeenman
Feb 18th, 2003, 07:56 PM
Originally posted by vbNeo
An hour OR TWO, hehe :-). But naa, i can do it, it's pretty nice, but it ain't that hard!(herby NOT SAYING my old site is better or harder to make!).
I can easily make the design in and hour, it's the contests that's the problems, see, i don't know anything about model aircrafts :eek:
Cheers!
Or WWII history, apparently. :rolleyes:
vbNeo
Feb 19th, 2003, 01:48 AM
Originally posted by cafeenman
Or WWII history, apparently. :rolleyes:
Hmm, i know aboout WW2 history. And i not just watching the "Lion" guy, there's history night on discoervy you know :rolleyes: . But fine if ya want to pull me down, try.
You won't ever be able to.
Anony
Feb 19th, 2003, 03:13 AM
I like models for aircrafts. They used to spraypaint those lovely blonde bombershells on the sides of the B-52's ! Beautiful.
cafeenman
Feb 19th, 2003, 07:25 AM
Originally posted by vbNeo
But fine if ya want to pull me down, try.
You won't ever be able to.
I apologize for my unwarranted personal comments. It's just that you claim to know a lot about WWII and it's obvious that you don't. I'll bet you've never even built a model airplane.
vbNeo
Feb 19th, 2003, 12:32 PM
I have build many small model aircrafts, and painted them to...
I always buy WW2 fighters/bombers, my favorite is "The Flying Fortress" :D
Arbiter
Feb 20th, 2003, 04:27 PM
Originally posted by vbNeo
READ what i wrote, they had 1 thousand RIFLES
Cheers!
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!!!
Hitler invaded Poland with 1000 rifles!!!!
That has got to be the funniest thing I have ever read! Damn, I didn't even get further through the thread than that line before I fell off my chair!!
Laugh? I nearly bought my own beer!!! :D
cafeenman
Feb 20th, 2003, 08:32 PM
Originally posted by Arbiter
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!!!
Hitler invaded Poland with 1000 rifles!!!!
That has got to be the funniest thing I have ever read! Damn, I didn't even get further through the thread than that line before I fell off my chair!!
Laugh? I nearly bought my own beer!!! :D
I had the same reaction, Arbiter. EVERYONE knows that Hitler had returned to Australia that year to be with relatives. When he returned to Germany, Poland and France were already occupied by Germany. He had nothing to do with it. It's funny that we have all these history "experts" completely contorting the facts.
Wally Pipp
Feb 21st, 2003, 03:35 AM
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2785981.stm
Potential problems are already looming. I wonder if anyone has given the post-saddam era serious thought ...
rjlohan
Feb 21st, 2003, 03:41 AM
Of course not, just as no thought was given to post-war Afghanistan, which is now in total anarchy, and the allied troops keeping Kabul in a state fit for CNN are gonna pull out. Americans and the rest of the western world don't care about Iraqi people. They only care about what's on their TV. Once the TV coverage stops, or if it never starts, as was the case with the Afghanistan invasion (US Government ordered no disparaging coverage was to go to air over that conflict).
It's a joke that so many people are jumping on the 'liberate Iraqis' bandwagon, when for 12 years no one much has given two hoots, and in Australia for example we only just went through a big 'send the refugees home' thing. The US will do a half-arsed job of rebuilding, long enough for the public to forget that their government had just murdered thousands of people, and those who avoided the bombs and guns were now living in poverty.
If these people really gave a **** about saving the oppressed, they'd have been just as vocal about helping Australia in East Timor, or helping Zimbabwe now.
Suzzi
Feb 22nd, 2003, 01:35 PM
Originally posted by rjlohan
If these people really gave a **** about saving the oppressed, they'd have been just as vocal about helping Australia in East Timor, or helping Zimbabwe now.
Or the poor buggers in New Jersey. I can't beleive the news reports I see everynight from there.... :(
mikeycorn
Feb 23rd, 2003, 09:24 AM
Did you know that when you put two z's in your pseudonym "Suzzi", the proper pronounciation of "Suz-zi" rhymes with "Scuzzy?"
No War!
Feb 23rd, 2003, 11:33 AM
You know what? America should just pull back there forces, send everybody home and have Bush state on tv that he is a gigantic dickhead! Then he should resign and leave a competent person handle the situation. That should solve the entire Middle East crisis, all at once!
Then they should tripple the amount of UN inspectors and everybody should buy french fries again!
Suzzi
Feb 23rd, 2003, 11:39 AM
Originally posted by mikeycorn
Did you know that when you put two z's in your pseudonym "Suzzi", the proper pronounciation of "Suz-zi" rhymes with "Scuzzy?"
Cool! Whats a scuzzy though? Never heard of that word?
mikeycorn
Feb 23rd, 2003, 11:50 AM
Perhaps you're British. Here's the translation:
http://cgi.peak.org/~jeremy/retort.cgi?American=scuzzy
Suzzi
Feb 23rd, 2003, 12:19 PM
Cool! I'm vile!
What does that mean? It sounds very sophisticated.
"Look at Suzzi, she's very vile."
mikeycorn
Feb 23rd, 2003, 12:35 PM
vile -
1. Loathsome; disgusting: vile language.
2. Unpleasant or objectionable: vile weather.
3a. Contemptibly low in worth or account; second-rate.
3b. Of mean or low condition.
4. Miserably poor and degrading; wretched: a vile existence.
5. Morally depraved; ignoble or wicked: a vile conspiracy.
BTW, "Suz-zi", I didn't say that you were scuzzy, I just said your name rhymed with scuzzy.
crptcblade
Feb 23rd, 2003, 12:37 PM
Originally posted by mikeycorn
Morally depraved
Suzzi, you vixen...
;)
Suzzi
Feb 23rd, 2003, 12:45 PM
Originally posted by mikeycorn
vile -
1. Loathsome; disgusting: vile language.
2. Unpleasant or objectionable: vile weather.
3a. Contemptibly low in worth or account; second-rate.
3b. Of mean or low condition.
4. Miserably poor and degrading; wretched: a vile existence.
5. Morally depraved; ignoble or wicked: a vile conspiracy.
BTW, "Suz-zi", I didn't say that you were scuzzy, I just said your name rhymed with scuzzy.
O, that's okay, I quite like the sound of being morally depraved.
mikeycorn
Feb 23rd, 2003, 02:04 PM
Fuzzy Suzzi was a bear,
Fuzzy Suzzi had no hair,
Fuzzy Suzzi wasn't fuzzy,
Was she?
The thought of a hairless Suzzi would be a nice thought if you could trust the avitar, but unfortunately I believe whoever posts as Suzzi looks like their avatar about as much as I believe that Saddam "Hussain" looks like his.
No War!
Feb 23rd, 2003, 04:13 PM
You' having a problem with my avatar?
mikeycorn
Feb 23rd, 2003, 04:19 PM
How are we supposed to know if that's really you, Saddam, and not one of your 19 different lookalikes?
Pc_Madness
Feb 23rd, 2003, 11:29 PM
You don't know, but you can talk to him as if it were Saddem himself, as hes more than likely going to report back anyway to Saddem anyway. :)
Ex-FB
Jul 19th, 2004, 11:54 AM
:p Man this thread was just hilarious. Hook, line and sinker.
mendhak
Jul 19th, 2004, 11:58 AM
I didn't go through this thread again, but is this the one where we tried to convince some guy that Pearl Harbor is just an urban legend?
:lol:
Ex-FB
Jul 19th, 2004, 11:59 AM
Yip, and all along he thought we were being serious. Oh, and remember the 1,000 admirals who had all been trained with shovels instead of rifles. That was in this one too.
mendhak
Jul 19th, 2004, 12:02 PM
Good times. :wave:
jhermiz
Jul 19th, 2004, 01:08 PM
I'd suggest you be careful with the subject of this thread.
That is very offending to any iraqi who is civilized.
How pathetic...:rolleyes:
Ex-FB
Jul 19th, 2004, 04:49 PM
Cool! It got moved into the right secction. :thumb: ;)
vbNeo
Jul 19th, 2004, 06:56 PM
Originally posted by mendhak
I didn't go through this thread again, but is this the one where we tried to convince some guy that Pearl Harbor is just an urban legend?
:lol:
yea, that was me, and it didn't succeed =P, anyways - suzzi is either very stupid or making a joke, because reading the first post in this thread over and over just makes me laugh my *ss off - Iraq shouldn't be allowed to have weapons, but a monkey should own a nuclear missile - that's hilarious :D
jhermiz
Jul 19th, 2004, 09:18 PM
Funny?
O come on...suzzi reminds me of the trailer park trash chics that go walking the streets of MI. :lol:
If anyone's to blame its that f****** idiot Bush...I wish I had a dime for everyone who says that same thing...I'd be a damn billionaire.
Why isn't bush on trial for his war crimes? O wait thats cause the US runs the UN :confused: :confused:
PAAAAAAAAAthetic!!!
Suzzi
Jul 20th, 2004, 01:14 AM
Originally posted by vbNeo
yea, that was me, and it didn't succeed =P, anyways - suzzi is either very stupid or making a joke, because reading the first post in this thread over and over just makes me laugh my *ss off - Iraq shouldn't be allowed to have weapons, but a monkey should own a nuclear missile - that's hilarious :D
I'm glad you find it funny, because that's exactly what it was meant to be. Come on, Germans bombing pearl harbour, the whole 1,000 admirals thing, "President" Churchills speech at the gates of Stalingrad????
It's taken you a year to realise it, but it was all a joke, and you fell for it hook line and sinker.
I hope you have more of a sense of humour than I suspect, and take it just as that, a bit of fun ribbing. I've noticed that you take some of these things a bit seriously, this is (or was) chit-chat. Piss taking is par for the course. Like I said before, lighten up, have fun.
mendhak
Jul 20th, 2004, 01:55 AM
Originally posted by vbNeo
yea, that was me, and it didn't succeed =P,
Yeah right. I'll bet you tried to convince all your friends about Pearl Harbor. You better go make amendments now, buddy. :p
CORONA BEER
Jul 20th, 2004, 05:51 AM
Originally posted by Suzzi
I'm a bit confused by why we let the Iraqi's have any weapons at all. I mean, apparently they are allowed to fire missiles that go for 150 miles......
Well, they could easily sell these to Canada, Mexico or Madagasca, and then they would be within striking distance of the USA. I think this is a very dangerous situation and we shouldn't be allowing them to even own knives. Some might argue that they need knives to cut up their pork etc., but I scoff at such remarks. If we civilised them, then they could eat Pizza, and then they would only need those circular pizza cutter thingies. Or they could just buy electric knives, then they would have to stay near power sockets.
mexico dont want none, lol @ canada launching rockets into the u.s.
demotivater
Jul 20th, 2004, 11:43 AM
knives to cut up their pork
:lol: :lol:
vbNeo
Jul 20th, 2004, 11:54 AM
Originally posted by cafeenman
I had the same reaction, Arbiter. EVERYONE knows that Hitler had returned to Australia that year to be with relatives. When he returned to Germany, Poland and France were already occupied by Germany. He had nothing to do with it. It's funny that we have all these history "experts" completely contorting the facts.
Bet his australian relatives were very proud of him... and fat to
yrwyddfa
Jul 23rd, 2004, 07:21 AM
Hitler's family tree can be traced back to Scotland where his great grandfather was sent to a big island miles away because he had a w**k in public; and was thus deemed criminal.
When Hitler continued the family tradition like his forebears the islanders booted him out so he went to Germany where w**nking is still OK even to this day; especially in matters of European superstate issues.
It was from there that Hitler found self-similar people to himself and termed the world fractal (which Benoit later stole) and decided it was good for the world to w**k and tried to invade it and force w**king sessions on all the people of the world
Of course, the French not being too unhappy with mass w**king sessions (which continues to this day in the EU) just rolled over when the shovels came.
The Russians refused to w**k because it was too damn cold to get it out (or get it off)
The Americans joined the war because they wanted to maintain the monopoly on w**king.
The Japansese killed themselves because w**king is against their moral code - they all got into planes but run out of fuel near Hawaii
The Italians couldn't decide whether w**king was a good idea or not - so kept changing their minds and what side theywere on. They invented the term fascism to be synonymous with w**kers.
yrwyddfa
Jul 23rd, 2004, 07:21 AM
The English of course continue to w**K in private wearing women's pantyhose with a tangerine shoved down their throats.
vbforums.com
Copyright Internet.com Inc., All Rights Reserved.