|
-
Aug 2nd, 2002, 09:50 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Fanatic Member
api loses to mfc?
Darn it, now I am interested in MFC.
But the syntax and all those .h and .cpp files just gives me a headache, can anyone kindly briefly explain it to me the structure and other crap please?

prog_tom
JOIN THE REVOLUTION!!!! Dual T3 backedup science community.
http://physics.sviesoft.com/forum
-
Aug 3rd, 2002, 03:38 AM
#2
Hyperactive Member
MFC sucks.
-
Aug 3rd, 2002, 08:06 AM
#3
Monday Morning Lunatic
Concisely put there 
Sure, for getting a program up and running, MFC is pretty good. Unfortunately, the code inside it is verging on the horrific side, plus it's fairly non-portable which is one of my projects for the future...
The VC++ documentation tells you about all the MFC stuff (this is one of the main stumbling blocks - it autogenerates a load of bumf which is almost impossible to read).
I refuse to tie my hands behind my back and hear somebody say "Bend Over, Boy, Because You Have It Coming To You".
-- Linus Torvalds
-
Aug 3rd, 2002, 11:59 AM
#4
Frenzied Member
Re: api loses to mfc?
Originally posted by prog_tom
Darn it, now I am interested in MFC.
But the syntax and all those .h and .cpp files just gives me a headache, can anyone kindly briefly explain it to me the structure and other crap please?
If you are interested, I suggest you learn C++ (just the basics), then learn to make a window with c++ (no mfc), then make an MFC project.
Or you could just stop after step 2
retired member. Thanks for everything 
-
Aug 3rd, 2002, 04:35 PM
#5
Hyperactive Member
If you use dialogbox functions in regular c++ .. Its almost as ez as MFC. But the one thing I found nice about MFC.. Was how it handled ActiveX Controls (ocx). It auto-generated classes for you to use the ocx component.
.... I still dont know how to use OCXs in C++, but I've never needed to use OCXs in C++
-
Aug 3rd, 2002, 06:54 PM
#6
Thread Starter
Fanatic Member
but why are all the books talking about MFC? Even parksie and most other members always use MFC to answer our humble questions.

prog_tom
JOIN THE REVOLUTION!!!! Dual T3 backedup science community.
http://physics.sviesoft.com/forum
-
Aug 3rd, 2002, 07:19 PM
#7
Frenzied Member
I dont think I have EVER seen parksie answer a question not specifically about MFC with MFC. You might be confusing MFC with the STL, the Standard Template Library. The two are completly different and separate.
Z.
-
Aug 4th, 2002, 06:09 AM
#8
Monday Morning Lunatic
Originally posted by Zaei
I dont think I have EVER seen parksie answer a question not specifically about MFC with MFC. You might be confusing MFC with the STL, the Standard Template Library. The two are completly different and separate.
Z.
And even if I can easily tell that they're using MFC, if they don't say it then I use STL or API just to punish them
I refuse to tie my hands behind my back and hear somebody say "Bend Over, Boy, Because You Have It Coming To You".
-- Linus Torvalds
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|