|
-
Jun 29th, 2002, 12:45 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Addicted Member
Wanna write C++ in VS.NET
I admit it.
I love C#, and am about to get VS.net, but I also want to be able to write plain c++. Not managed c++, just plain-ole, no .NET C++. Is it possible with VS.NET, or should I have VS 6 for this?
Thanks,
Carole
-
Jun 29th, 2002, 01:06 PM
#2
MS would be shot if they removed standard C++ from VS.NET =). In fact, the compiler is much closer to the standard then VC6, so I hear.
Z.
-
Jun 29th, 2002, 01:13 PM
#3
Thread Starter
Addicted Member
Originally posted by Zaei
MS would be shot if they removed standard C++ from VS.NET =).
Yeah, that's true... but then, MS has been accused of doing such things as well.
Thanks for the info.
-
Jun 29th, 2002, 02:58 PM
#4
Monday Morning Lunatic
Originally posted by Zaei
MS would be shot if they removed standard C++ from VS.NET =). In fact, the compiler is much closer to the standard then VC6, so I hear.
Z.
It is 
Wonderfully, I wrote up a load of code with GCC 3.0.1 under Linux, then transferred it to VC7 and there were only two problems:
1. I'd used strcasecmp which is only on POSIX (equivalent of stricmp).
2. I'd missed some iterators where I should have had const_iterators (VC7 picked up on them where GCC didn't )
I refuse to tie my hands behind my back and hear somebody say "Bend Over, Boy, Because You Have It Coming To You".
-- Linus Torvalds
-
Jun 29th, 2002, 03:13 PM
#5
Thread Starter
Addicted Member
Hey wow! MS got something right!! Did they even get something "righter" than gnu???
-
Jun 29th, 2002, 03:20 PM
#6
Monday Morning Lunatic
Just that one they did 
Although GCC whomps it for all sorts of template trickery which only a mother (or Kedaman) could love
I refuse to tie my hands behind my back and hear somebody say "Bend Over, Boy, Because You Have It Coming To You".
-- Linus Torvalds
-
Jun 29th, 2002, 10:11 PM
#7
transcendental analytic
parksie, have you got the thing to link and work in windows?
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Jun 30th, 2002, 04:53 AM
#8
Monday Morning Lunatic
No 
I tried getting it working under Cygwin but it was having trouble installing. It compiled ok, and I could actually run the compiler on something, but it was completely lost for all its paths, and went extremely strange
I refuse to tie my hands behind my back and hear somebody say "Bend Over, Boy, Because You Have It Coming To You".
-- Linus Torvalds
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|