Corren
Apr 2nd, 2002, 08:02 PM
Okay, what makes BitBlt() so special when you have two picture boxes - one for a black background and another with a picture in it, and you want to put the picture onto the black background?
Couldn't you just use the background picture as a container to hold the picture instead of using BitBlt()?
What I mean is that I have a picture of a dragon hovering on a black, stary background with quite a bit of code using BitBlt, when all I really need to do is just pop the picture onto the background and have much fewer lines of code to make it hover.
Can someone please tell me what is so special about BitBlt() that would make it so prefered over just doing something with even few lines of code? Seems kind of inefficient...
Couldn't you just use the background picture as a container to hold the picture instead of using BitBlt()?
What I mean is that I have a picture of a dragon hovering on a black, stary background with quite a bit of code using BitBlt, when all I really need to do is just pop the picture onto the background and have much fewer lines of code to make it hover.
Can someone please tell me what is so special about BitBlt() that would make it so prefered over just doing something with even few lines of code? Seems kind of inefficient...