Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Interesting stuff..

  1. #1

    Thread Starter
    Hyperactive Member thinktank2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Arctic
    Posts
    272

    Lightbulb Interesting stuff..

    Playing with factorials I found the following

    x^2 - x = x! (or) x(x-1) = x!

    has unique Solution: x = 2

    x^3 - 3x^2 + 2x = x! (or) x(x-1)(x-2) = x!

    has unique Solution: x = 3

    Similarly,

    x^4 - 6x^3 + 11x^2 - 6x = x! has the unique solution x=4
    and

    x^5 - 10x^4 + 35x^3 - 50x^2 + 24x = x !

    has the unique solution x=5

    You can notice that solution for all these equation is the highest power of x in the equation. I think this is unique

    because other than the equation x = 1 ...

    I haven't heard of a polynomial equation that has a unique solution with the solution equal to the highest power of x in the equation.

    The coefficents of these equation seems to follow a pattern.
    I would like to know how to generate the coefficents for the nth degree equation.

    The only cubic equation that can be equal to x! is

    x^3 - 3x^2 + 2x

    So... even the polynomial eqs are unique for a factorial.
    Last edited by thinktank2; Jan 29th, 2002 at 12:09 AM.

  2. #2
    pathfinder NotLKH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Posts
    2,397

    Re: Interesting stuff..

    Originally posted by thinktank2
    Playing with factorials I found the following

    x^2 - x = x! (or) x(x-1) = x!

    has unique Solution: x = 2
    .................
    Hmm, 3^2 - 3 = 6 = 3!

  3. #3

  4. #4
    pathfinder NotLKH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Posts
    2,397
    So, Certainly
    x(x-1)(x-2)...(x-n) always equals (n+1)!, when x = n+1
    {test::if x = 4: 4(4-1)(4-2)(4-3) = (3+1)!, yepp!}

    AND, if My math is correct:

    x(x-1)(x-2)....(x-n) = x(x-1)(x-2)....(x-n)(x - n - 1)
    or:
    x(x-1)(x-2)....(x-n) (1-x+n+1)=0
    meaning
    x(x-1)(x-2)....(x-n) = x(x-1)(x-2)....(x-n)(x - n - 1) always has the solution:

    x = n+2
    or
    x(x-1)(x-2)...(x-n) = (n+2)!

    lets test.
    if x = 7, then n = 5
    first, place n into the equation
    x(x-1)(x-2)(x-3)(x-4)(x-5) = x(x-1)(x-2)(x-3)(x-4)(x-5)(x-5-1)
    next place x into it:

    7(7-1)(7-2)(7-3)(7-4)(7-5) = 7*6*5*4*3*2*1
    or
    7*6*5*4*3*2 = 7*6*5*4*3*2*1
    yepp.

    also
    6*5*4*3*2*1 = 6*

    So, for the equation:
    x(x-1)(x-2)(x-3)(x-4)(x-5) = x!
    there are 2 answers:
    x=6, k = 6
    and
    x = 7, k = 7

    Now, this does not prevent other solutions to exist.

    The real form of the equation is:
    x(x-1)(x-2)(x-3)...(x-n) = x(x-1)(x-2)(x-3)...(x-n)(x-n-1)(x-n-2)(x-n-3)....(x-n-b).
    where x-n-b = 1.

    And I've shown that x can have 2 soulutions, x = (n+1) {ie... b=0}
    or x = (n+2) {ie...b=1}

    What would be most impressive is if you could prove that there are no other values for b that produces Integer solutions for x, where n > 0, x > n, x > b, b >= 0; x,n,b are integral values.

  5. #5

    Thread Starter
    Hyperactive Member thinktank2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Arctic
    Posts
    272
    Sorry, that was a blunder. I Was checking like n! and (n-1)! but failed to check for (n+1)!

    Now , I can say there are only two solutions for an equation(Let's call it the TT equation ) of any degree.


    Originally posted by NotLKH
    The above can be solved like this:
    x(x-1)=x(x-1)(x-2)
    x(x-1)(1-x+2)=0
    yielding
    x = 0
    x = 1
    x = 3
    This is not the correct way because we cannot replace n! by something like n(n-1) or n(n-1)(n-2)

    n! represent the exact value.

    x(x-1) = x(x-1)(x-2) ---- Eq1 is a different equation altogether.
    solving u get 0,1,3

    But only 3 satifies the equation
    x(x-1) = x! ---- Eq 2

    and an Important value 2 is not found by equation 1

  6. #6

    Thread Starter
    Hyperactive Member thinktank2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Arctic
    Posts
    272
    Well...it's boring to develop a proof for it. But you can see that

    x(x-1)(x-2)(x-3)....(x-(n-1)) = x!

    has the solutions

    x = n and
    x = n+1

    and

    For x=n,

    you can write 2 equations

    x(x-1)(x-2).........(x-(n-1)) = x!

    and

    x(x-1)(x-2)....(x-(n-2)) = x!

  7. #7
    pathfinder NotLKH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Posts
    2,397
    Originally posted by NotLKH
    ....Now, this does not prevent other solutions to exist.

    The real form of the equation is:
    x(x-1)(x-2)(x-3)...(x-n) = x(x-1)(x-2)(x-3)...(x-n)(x-n-1)(x-n-2)(x-n-3)....(x-n-b).
    where x-n-b = 1.
    ... and where n > 0, x > n, x > b, b >= 0; x,n,b are integral values.

    And I've shown that x can have 2 soulutions, x = (n+1) {ie... b=0}
    or x = (n+2) {ie...b=1}

    ....
    Actually, if the equation is altered to:
    x(x-1)(x-2)(x-3)...(x-n) = abs(x)(abs(x)-1)(abs(x)-2)(abs(x)-3)...(abs(x)-n)(abs(x)-n-1)(abs(x)-n-2)(abs(x)-n-3)....(abs(x)-n-b),
    where abs(x)-n-b = 1, and x <> 0, then we see that your original eq:

    x(x-1) = a factorial, then it really has 4 solutions,
    x = 2, x = 3, x = -1, and x = -2:

    2*(2-1) = 2!
    3*(3-1) = 3!
    (-1)*(-1-1) = 2!
    (-2)*(-2-1) = 3!

    or:
    x(x-1) = (abs(x-1))!, x = {3, 2, -1, -2}


  8. #8

    Thread Starter
    Hyperactive Member thinktank2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Arctic
    Posts
    272
    Originally posted by NotLKH

    x(x-1) = a factorial, then it really has 4 solutions,
    x = 2, x = 3, x = -1, and x = -2:

    2*(2-1) = 2!
    3*(3-1) = 3!
    (-1)*(-1-1) = 2!
    (-2)*(-2-1) = 3!
    No , You have misunderstood the equation

    For example The TT second degree equation is not

    x(x-1) = some factorial

    it is

    x(x-1) = x! (get the difference ??... though they seem to be the same)

    x(x-1) = (abs(x-1))!, x = {3, 2, -1, -2}
    May be we should call that NotLKH's Second degree equation

    but you see...it's not that elegant
    Last edited by thinktank2; Jan 29th, 2002 at 11:58 AM.

  9. #9

    Thread Starter
    Hyperactive Member thinktank2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Arctic
    Posts
    272
    Sad thing is.. mathematica cannot directly solve ThinkTank equations

    Something like

    Solve[x(x-1) == x!, x ]

    doesn't work, { It says it can't solve transcendental expressions }

    I plotted the curves for

    Abs(x(x-1)-x!) and they cut the x-axis at two points.

    But again the graph is kind of spoiled since, x is stepped up in non integer amount. I am trying to figure out how to step up x in integers...
    Last edited by thinktank2; Jan 29th, 2002 at 03:34 PM.

  10. #10
    pathfinder NotLKH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Posts
    2,397
    Thinktank2,
    Perhaps, instead of feeding it x!, you could feed it the expansion:
    {from your link: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Factorial.html}



    Mathematica might be able to use it that way.
    BTW, It works on Non-Integer Values, so if you ever wondered what 2.1! was, it'll give it to you.

    Attached Images Attached Images  

  11. #11
    DerFarm
    Guest
    Look at it this way, TT, have you ever been considered
    transcendental before?

  12. #12

    Thread Starter
    Hyperactive Member thinktank2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Arctic
    Posts
    272
    OMG ...edit edit edit...

    Solve[x(x-1) == x!, x ]

    doesn't work, { It says it can't solve transcendental expressions }

    I plotted the curves for ....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  



Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width