|
-
Oct 9th, 2001, 05:20 AM
#1
Thread Starter
transcendental analytic
ok I understand.
If you want an inline approach, this is the way:
double y=(int)(x*100.0)/100.0;
you power the radix by -decimal (a negative decimal gives precision lower than 1. Note the floating point division.
for variable radix or amount of decimals you can use this generic expression:
double z;
int r=10,d=2;
double y=(int)(x*(z=pow(r,d)))/z;
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|